|
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE
COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE
YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE
STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND
108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING
OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE
I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE
OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS. |
Chapter 15:
Even after six
months, it still felt like a mistake. At the back of his mind, he still
half-expected Control to call one day and say the Justice Department had
fouled up as usual but everything was all right now, that it was time to
send him out again.
He didn't blame the DIA for what had happened, or for fading from sight
when it did. Control had told him often enough that the agency would
never surface in his defence if anything went wrong. If it acknowledged
his existence, it would also have to acknowledge its own existence,
thereby inviting precisely the attention it had to avoid. To do its job
properly, the DIA needed to remain invisible.
Even so ... Coleman knew the power it could exercise behind the scenes,
and went on hoping through the summer of 1990 that Control would somehow
find the right strings to pull. The appearance of Marshall Lee Miller to
handle his defence against the passport violation charge had seemed more
than just providential. By introducing him to Pan Am's lawyers before
bowing out again, Miller had broken Coleman's alarming sense of
isolation and put him in touch with at least a measure of the support he
needed, support that the DIA itself was unable to give.
And he needed all the encouragement he could get, for the threats had
started again. Between June and September, his mother, Margie Coleman,
in Birmingham, Alabama, received about 20 calls on her unlisted phone
from men threatening to kill her son, to kidnap his wife and children
and to harm her for taking them in. An elderly lady in doubtful health,
she was terrified, particularly when the calls continued after her
unlisted number was changed. From what was said, and the callers'
apparent familiarity with his work in Cyprus, Coleman had little doubt
that they were confidential informants of the Drug Enforcement
Administration.
On 12 June, this impression was reinforced by a call from the Special
Agent in Charge of the DEA's Birmingham field office, who strongly
recommended that he plead guilty to the passport violation charge and at
all costs 'don't get the DEA involved in your case'.
Angry now, Coleman travelled alone to Chicago on 21 June and,
unrepresented, pleaded not guilty to the charge before Chief Judge James
B. Moran after waiving a formal reading of the indictment.
"He asked me, 'Where's your
attorney?' [Coleman recalls). So I said, 'I don't have an attorney, your
honour. I came here to plead not guilty. Don't need an attorney for
that.' So the hearing was over in two minutes. I picked up my briefcase,
started out the door and asked the FBI agent on the case to see me
downstairs to a cab because I didn't feel very safe in Chicago. He
wanted to know why, so I asked him how much he knew about me. 'Well, we
know a lot,' he said. 'But there's a lot more we'd like to know.' 'Me,
too,' I said. 'But I can't tell you anything. And I'm sorry about that
because we could probably settle this thing in twenty minutes.'
His display of
independence seemed to make matters worse. The telephone threats became
more frequent; he and Mary-Claude were often followed when they went
out, together or separately, and word began to filter back that FBI
agents were questioning his friends, neighbours and former associates.
On the other hand, the government seemed in no particular hurry to press
its charges against him. At a case status hearing on 17 August, the
court appointed a public defender to represent him and then adjourned
the proceedings until a further status hearing on 3 January 1991, at
which time a trial date would be set. As Coleman discovered later, it
was not uncommon for the Justice Department to leave a case dangling
over the head of a former government employee whom it wished to
intimidate.
What finally persuaded him that, without allies or resources, he would
never escape its clutches was the government's refusal to produce any of
the material he needed for his defence, even his DEA file. When his
court-appointed attorney, Michael Deutsch, filed a discovery motion on
30 August for documents that might show Coleman had been acting under
orders when he applied for the Thomas Leavy passport, the DEA, the DIA
and the CIA all declined to comply on grounds of national security.
By now he was under no illusions about the reason for the frame-up.
Though nobody on the government side had shown his hand, it was hardly
necessary. This was an obvious attempt to secure his silence in return
for a plea-bargain and suspended sentence on the passport charge. If
that failed, the next move would probably be to a Federal penitentiary
where a fight in the yard or a sudden bout of pneumonia would secure his
silence for good.
They could also get at him through his wife and children, as the
threatening phone calls had made plain. Down to his last few hundred
dollars, and with nothing but the good offices of a public defender
standing between him and the octopus, it was time to evacuate the
hostages. And to tell Pan Am what he knew.
Nobody else seemed to be interested. None of the agencies involved in
the official investigation of the Flight 103 bombing, either British or
American, had even attempted to question him about the activities he had
observed on Cyprus, despite all the rumours of the DEA's involvement.
To save his neck and protect his family was perhaps not the noblest of
motives for coming forward as a witness, but if the DEA had not sought
to frame him under the misapprehension that he was feeding information
to Pan Am and the media, and if the DIA had not lacked the will to
protect him behind the scenes, the idea of coming forward would never
have crossed his mind at all -- indeed, he might never even have known
that he had a contribution to make to the Lockerbie investigation.
As a secret agent of the Defense Intelligence Agency, his first, last
and only duty would have been, as always, to the US government. But with
his back to the wall, and with the octopus bent on destroying him
through no fault of his own, his first, last and only duty was to his
family. And yet he was still reluctant to make public his connection
with the DIA.
By now he was convinced that it had merely acquiesced in the frame-up
after his arrest. The likeliest explanation seemed to be that, in the
autumn of 1986, Control had indicated to the DEA that Coleman had worked
for the DIA in the past but, as he was no longer active, the agency had
no objection to his taking up a consultant's job with Hurley on Cyprus.
As Coleman's real job was to file back-channel reports on the operations
of DEA Nicosia, the DIA was hardly likely to have told Hurley that they
were lending him a full-time agent. They never revealed the identity of
their agents to anybody in any case.
As far as the DEA was concerned, therefore, Coleman had none of the
status or protection of being a government agent; he was a civilian
consultant on a short-term contract who, as instructed, and as a matter
of courtesy, had provided the Cyprus country office with a copy of his
alternative identity papers.
Without Coleman's knowledge, and without consulting the DIA (on this
basis, they had no reason to do so), either Hurley or Dany Habib had
subsequently used those papers -- in particular, the copy they had taken
of Coleman's Thomas Leavy birth certificate -- to obtain a passport for
one of their own people in Egypt, thus cocking the trigger for a
possible violation alert when Coleman also applied for a passport in
that name two years later.
No matter how paranoid he felt from time to time about the DIA, Coleman
could not conceive that Control would have told him to get hold of a
legitimate Thomas Leavy passport for Operation Shakespeare knowing in
advance that it would blow the mission and lead to his arrest. He could
only assume that, being unaware of his true status as a DIA agent, the
DEA and its oversight agency, the FBI, had seen him as a soft target,
and framed the passport violation charge as a means of silencing an
awkward witness without realizing who he was or the damage they were
doing.
He could even appreciate how tricky a situation this must have been for
the DIA, although it did little to ease his sense of injury. The
Pentagon would have been furious at losing an agent as well as a major
mission, but there was little or nothing it could say or do to put
things right without acknowledging that Coleman was an agent and thereby
admitting that, for the better part of two years, the DIA had been
spying, not on the country's official enemies, but on other agencies of
the United States government.
On 11 September, Coleman petitioned the US District Court, Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern Division, for a change in his bail
conditions. To support himself and his family, now on the edge of
penury, he urgently needed to resume his occupation as a freelance
journalist specializing in Middle Eastern affairs, and for that, he had
to be able to travel.
As the prosecution still seemed in no hurry to have a trial date set,
Chief Judge Moran overruled the government's objections and ordered that
Coleman's legal passport be returned, subject to his giving the
prosecutor two weeks' notice of his intention to leave the country and
to his reporting in to his pre-trial services officer every other week
by telephone.
Two weeks later, Coleman arrived in Gibraltar to clear out the funds
standing to his credit at Barclays Bank. He felt the government owed him
that much at least -- and as the DIA had not seen fit to close the
account, perhaps Control thought so, too. At any rate, he now had a
little breathing space. As the DEA was plainly out to get him, and had
blocked all access to the files he needed to clear himself, the only
avenue open to him was to work with Pan Am, in the common interest of
getting at the truth, using his training and experience to piece
together the best defence he could.
But at a distance, and with some of the pressure off, Coleman began to
wonder how much difference it would make if he did. The charge was such
an obvious frame-up that he had to ask himself if there had ever been
any intention to try him on it.
The central problem for the government was the central element in its
case, the Thomas Leavy birth certificate. If the DEA had used it to
provide a cover identity for somebody In Egypt, it could hardly admit
that in open court or explain how it had come by the certificate in the
first place. And yet, without showing prior use, how could the
prosecution explain why Coleman's application for a passport in that
name had alerted the passport office to a possible violation?
Compounding the problem was the fact that, as far as Coleman knew, no
such person as Thomas Leavy had ever existed. How, then, could the
government explain why he came to be in possession of a genuine birth
certificate for a non-existent person without embarrassing the CIA,
which had given it to him in the first place? And if the government had
provided it for his use, why was it now prosecuting him for using it?
With so many awkward questions hanging over the case, Coleman found it
hard to imagine that the government would take it into court -- and was
not at all reassured by the thought. If the charge had been framed
merely to intimidate, when it failed to do so, the octopus would
presumably try something else. Perhaps something more drastic.
So far, Coleman's meetings with Pan Am's attorneys had been informal,
and the information he provided fairly basic, but while poking about in
Europe, he became aware that somebody else, either within the DEA or
close to it, was also talking knowledgeably about a link between DEA
Nicosia and the bombing of Flight 103.
"Based on information from some
source within the government, both ABC and NBC were researching stories
on the DEA connection [Coleman remembers]. ABC tracked me down after
seeing some of the papers in my case and wanted to know if I could
confirm what they'd been told. Oddly enough, one of Pierre Salinger's
researchers, Linda Mack, while trying to check me out, had talked to
another of their staffers, David Mills -- the former Newsweek
photographer who'd looked me up on Cyprus in 1987 and sold some pictures
to Hurley. Anyway, I met Salinger in London to go over the story with
him and confirmed those parts of it I knew to be true. He was just
checking his facts with me. He had the story already.
"So did NBC. Again, I don't know where they got their information from
but I confirmed that the DEA had been running controlled deliveries
through Cyprus while I was there and that its operations had been wide
open from a security point of view. Brian Ross wanted me to go on camera
to say so, but I refused. I figured the last interview I'd given them,
right after the bombing of Flight 103, had probably been the root cause
of why my life had been turned inside out, and I wasn't looking for any
more trouble.
"Neither Salinger nor Ross knew of my role in Cyprus as a DIA agent, and
I certainly didn't tell them. Nor did their broadcasts attribute any
part of the story to me -- there was no reason for them to do that
because I'd told them nothing they didn't already know. But I should
have guessed that Hurley and his crowd would again put two and two
together and make 22. Catch 22.
"After talking to the Pan Am legal team in London, I flew back to the
States to be with my family, and a few weeks later, the DEA did do
something more drastic. Apparently convinced that I was behind the ABC
and NBC stories and the media follow-up around the world, they blew my
cover in a television broadcast that also went out around the world.
They set me up as a target. And my wife and babies, too."
On the second
anniversary of the Lockerbie disaster, a few days after Pan Am obtained
leave to file its third-party suit against the US government, Steven
Emerson aired an 'exclusive' on Cable News Network about the wave of
speculation linking the DEA with the bombing of Flight 103.
Favoured with the inside story of the Fawaz Younis kidnapping and other
government 'exclusives', Emerson's special relationship with Federal
law-enforcement agencies was again on display when he quoted unnamed
Washington sources to the effect that allegations of DEA involvement in
the Lockerbie disaster had been traced to one Lester Knox Coleman, a
'disgruntled former DEA confidential informant who was terminated'.
The terminology was interesting. 'Confidential informant', like
'cooperating individual', usually means that the snitch in question was,
or is, engaged in drug trafficking and cooperating with the DEA in order
to avoid imprisonment. Anything he has to say, therefore, even under
oath, needs to be taken with a pinch of salt. The fact that Coleman was
also said to have been 'terminated' further underlined the notion of his
unreliability by suggesting that, even as a snitch, he was not to be
believed.
More serious from the point of view of his personal safety, by blowing
his cover and stressing that he no longer enjoyed the government's
protection, the CNN broadcast, in effect, declared open season on Lester
Coleman. It all but invited every cop-hating drug freak, every aggrieved
drugs trafficker from the Bekaa Valley to Los Angeles, every
ultra-right, gun-running, Contra-supporting machismo addict, and every
thwarted narco-terrorist or Muslim extremist looking for a safe or cheap
revenge to 'terminate' him also.
CNN also showed Coleman's picture.
From then on, any semblance of normal life became impossible. Without
resources, unable to earn a living, at the mercy of at least two Federal
agencies determined to silence him by one means or another, and now set
up as a government-approved target for any stray kook or fanatic,
Coleman had to find a more defensible position.
"Emerson's story sent everybody
into a tailspin [he says], including Mary-Claude's family in Lebanon. I
never saw the broadcast, but it seemed to be a clear attempt to
discredit me. There was even a suggestion that I was one of Juval Aviv's
sources for the Interfor Report, although I had never met the man or
even seen his report at that point.
"The government's obvious intention was to identify me as the main
source of all the criticism and speculation running counter to the
official line on Flight 103 and then to destroy me. Or, if that failed,
to destroy my credibility. So I said, Screw this -- I'm getting us out
of here. And judging by the calls we got after the programme, there
wasn't much time.
"The worst were those with Arab accents. 'Your son is dead.' 'We know
where your children are.' 'If he ever comes to Lebanon, he's a dead
man.' 'We're going to kill his wife's family.' 'We're going to take
Sarah, grind her up and send her back as hamburger meat.' Stuff like
that. And they weren't kidding. I know these people. They were working
themselves up to do it. So I set up a little deception plan, charged my
credit cards to the limit and smuggled Mary-Claude and the children out
to Europe. I was pretty well broke by then, but thanks to the good
offices of Msgr. John Esseff, they were taken in by the Sisters of
Charity, the Most Reverend Mother Teresa's order, who hid them out in a
convent in Spain.
"Now I had to do something about Mary-Claude's family, because after
Emerson's broadcast, they started getting calls as well. And you don't
fool with those because things are on a shorter fuse in Beirut. They
didn't have any money either at this point, so to get them out, I had to
slip back into the States without anybody knowing and sell off
everything we owned -- all the furniture and household stuff. Even so,
it was only just enough. And there we were. Hiding out in Europe.
Penniless, homeless and exhausted. But at least we were still alive."
Though still
seriously at risk.
Careful to avoid being declared a fugitive, Coleman had kept up the
fortnightly calls to his pre-trial services officer in Chicago,
reporting truthfully but contriving to leave his precise whereabouts in
doubt. A trial date had finally been set for 17 June 1991, but given the
obvious flimsiness of the case, he was still concerned that somebody
within the DEA might be tempted into direct action. Its army of lowlife
informants was not short of potential assassins. And for all he knew,
pro-Syrian elements, the Lebanese Forces and other narco-terrorist
groups were also still looking to revenge themselves for the damage that
he and the Asmar cell had done to their drugs, arms and hostage-taking
operations in Beirut.
The Colemans needed sanctuary.
On 17 April 1991, he met Pan Am's legal team for five days in Brussels.
Until his family was safe, he had declined to make any formal statement,
but now he went with them to the American Embassy and swore out an
affidavit about what he had seen as a DIA agent assigned to DEA NARCOG,
Nicosia.
He also described a call he had made later to his friend Hartmut Mayer
of the BKA asking him if he knew how the bomb had been put aboard Flight
103. As he was not involved in the investigation, Mayer had put him in
touch with a colleague, Bert Pinsdorf, in Germany, who, in answer to the
same question, said the 'BKA had serious concerns that the drug-sting
operation originating in Cyprus had caused the bomb to be placed on the
Pan Am plane.'
Using a new set of genuine Thomas Leavy documents based on his legal
name change --the last thing he supposed the Federal authorities would
be on the lookout for -- Coleman then slipped back into the States, via
Canada, for what he felt in his bones was probably the last time he
would see his father and his country. After spending a few weeks there,
he flew to Frankfurt on 29 May, where he rejoined Mary-Claude and the
children, who had meanwhile been looked after by Mother Teresa's Sisters
of Charity.
From Germany, they travelled by train to Sweden, where he applied for
asylum, the first American citizen to do so since the Vietnam War.
Go to Next Page
|