|
THE CLERISY of the nation (a far apter exponent
of the thing meant, than the term which the usus et norma loquendi forces on me), the clerisy,
I say,
or national church, in its primary acceptation and
original intention comprehended the learned of all
denominations; -- the sages and professors of law and
jurisprudence; of medicine and physiology; of music;
of military and civil architecture; of the physical sciences; with the mathematical as the common
organ of the preceding; in short, all the so called
liberal arts and sciences, the possession and application
of which constitute the civilization of a country,
as well as the Theological. The last was,
indeed, placed at the head of all; and of good right
did it claim the precedence. But why? Because
under the name of Theology, or Divinity, were
contained the interpretation of languages; the conservation
and tradition of past events; the momentous
epochs, and revolutions of the race and nation;
the continuation of the records; logic, ethics, and
the determination of ethical science, in application
to the rights and duties of men in all their various
relations, social and civil; and lastly, the ground-knowledge,
the prima scientia as it was named, --
PHILOSOPHY, or the doctrine and discipline of ideas. [That is, of knowledges immediate, yet real, and herein
distinguished in kind from logical and mathematical truths, which
express not realities, but only the necessary forms of conceiving
and perceiving, and are therefore named the formal or abstract
sciences. Ideas, on the other hand, or the truths of philosophy,
properly so called, correspond to substantial beings, to
objects
whose actual subsistence is implied in their idea, though only by
the idea revealable. To adopt the language of the great philosophic
apostle, they are "spiritual realities that can only spiritually
be discerned," and the inherent aptitude and moral preconfiguration
to which constitutes what we mean by ideas, and by the
presence of ideal truth, and of ideal power, in the human being.
They, in fact, constitute his humanity. For try to conceive a
man without the ideas of God, eternity, freedom, will, absolute
truth, of the good, the true, the beautiful, the infinite. An animal
endowed with a memory of appearances and of facts might
remain. But the man will have vanished, and you have instead
a creature, "more subtile than any beast of the field, but likewise
cursed above every beast of the field; upon the belly must it go
and dust must it eat all the days of its life." But I recal myself
from a train of thoughts, little likely to find favour in this age of
sense and selfishness.]
Theology formed only a part of the objects, the
Theologians formed only a portion of the clerks
or clergy, of the national church. The theological
order had precedency indeed, and deservedly; but not because its members were priests, whose office
was to conciliate the invisible powers and to superintend
the interests that survive the grave; not
as being exclusively, or even principally, sacerdotal
or templar, which, when it did occur, is to be considered
as an accident of the age, a mis-growth of
ignorance and oppression, a falsification of the
constitutive principle, not a constituent part of the
same. No! The Theologians took the lead, because
the SCIENCE of Theology was the root and the trunk
of the knowledges that civilized man, because it
gave unity and the circulating sap of life to all other
sciences, by virtue of which alone they could be
contemplated as forming, collectively, the living tree
of knowledge. It had the precedency, because,
under the name theology, were comprised all the
main aids, instruments, and materials of NATIONAL
EDUCATION, the nisus formativus of the body
politic, the shaping and informing spirit, which educing, i.e. eliciting, the latent
man in all the
natives of the soil, trains them up to citizens of
the country, free subjects of the realm. And
lastly, because to divinity belong those fundamental
truths, which are the common ground-work of our
civil and our religious duties; not less indispensable
to a right view of our temporal concerns, than to
a rational faith respecting our immortal well-being.
(Not without celestial observations, can even terrestrial
charts be accurately constructed.) And
of especial importance is it to the objects here
contemplated, that only by the vital warmth diffused
by these truths throughout the MANY, and by the
guiding light from the philosophy, which is the
basis of divinity, possessed by the FEW, can either
the community or its rulers fully comprehend, or
rightly appreciate, the permanent distinction, and
the occasional contrast, between cultivation and
civilization; or be made to understand this most
valuable of the lessons taught by history, and
exemplified alike in her oldest and her most recent
records -- that a nation can never be a too cultivated,
but may easily become an over-civilized race...
I may be allowed to express
the final cause of the whole by the office and purpose of
the greater part -- and this is, to form and train up the
people of the country to obedient, free, useful, organizable
subjects, citizens, and patriots, living to the benefit of
the state, and prepared to die for its defence....
State of nature, or the
Ouran Outang theory of the origin of the human race,
substituted for the Book of Genesis, ch. I. -- X. Rights of
nature for the duties and privileges of citizens. Idealess
facts, misnamed proofs from history, grounds of experience,
&c., substituted for principles and the insight derived from
them.... Meantime, the true historical feeling, the immortal
life of an historical Nation, generation linked to
generation by faith, freedom, heraldry, and ancestral fame,
languishing, and giving place to the superstitions of
wealth, and newspaper reputation....
Concluding address to the
parliamentary leaders of the Liberalists and Utilitarians. I
respect the talents of many, and the motives and character
of some among you too sincerely to court the scorn, which I
anticipate. But neither shall the fear of it prevent me from
declaring aloud, and as a truth which I hold it the disgrace
and calamity of a professed statesman not to know and
acknowledge, that a permanent, nationalized, learned order,
a national clerisy or church, is an essential element of a
rightly constituted nation, without which it wants the best
security alike for its permanence and its progression; and
for which neither tract societies, nor conventicles, nor
Lancastrian schools, nor mechanics' institutions, nor
lecture-bazaars under the absurd name of universities, nor
all these collectively, can be a substitute. For they are
all marked with the same asterisk of spuriousness, shew the
same distemper-spot on the front, that they are empirical
specifics for morbid symptoms that help to feed and
continue the disease.
But you wish for
general illumination: you
would spur-arm the toes of society: you would enlighten the higher ranks
per ascensum ab
imis. You
begin, therefore, with the attempt to popularize science:
but you will only effect its plebification. It is
folly to think of making all, or the many, philosophers,
or even men of science and systematic knowledge.
But it is duty and wisdom to aim at making
as many as possible soberly and steadily religious;
-- inasmuch as the morality which the state requires
in its citizens for its own well-being and ideal immortality,
and without reference to their spiritual
interest as individuals, can only exist for the people in the form of religion....
In fine, Religion, true or false, is and ever has been the
centre of gravity in a realm, to which all other things must
and will accommodate themselves....
And in the
thorough assurance of its truth I make the assertion, that the
perspicuity, and (with singularly few exceptions even for us) the
uniform intelligibility, and close consecutive meaning, verse by verse,
with the simplicity and grandeur of the plan, and the
admirable ordonnance of the parts, are among the prominent
beauties of the Apocalypse. Nor do I doubt, that the substance
and main argument of this sacred oratorio, or drama sui generis
(the Prometheus of Eschylus comes the nearest to the kind)
were supplied by John the Evangelist: though I incline with Eusebius to find the poet himself in John, an Elder and Contemporary
of the Church of Ephesus....
The
world in which I exist is another world indeed, but not to come. It is
as present as (if that be at all) the magnetic planet, of which,
according to the Astronomer HALLEY, the visible globe, that we
inverminate, is the case or travelling-trunk -- a neat little
world where light still exists in statu perfuso, as on the
third day of the Creation, before it was polarised into outward and
inward, i.e. while light and life were one and the same,
NEITHER existing formally, yet BOTH iminenter: and when
herb, flower, and forest, rose as a vision, in proprio lucido,
the ancestor and unseen yesterday of the sun and moon. Now, whether
there really is such an elysian mundus mundulus incased in the
Macrocosm, or Great World, below the Adamantine Vault that supports the
Mother Waters, that support the coating crust of that mundus immundus on
which we, and others less scantily furnished from nature's Leggery,
crawl, delve, and nestle -- (or, shall I say the Liceum,
-- the said Dr. Halley may, perhaps, by this time, have ascertained: and
to him and the philosophic ghosts, his compeers, I leave it. But that
another world is inshrined in the microcosm I not only believe, but at
certain depths of my Being, during the solemner Sabbaths of the Spirit,
I have held commune therewith, in the power of that Faith, which is "the
substance of the things hoped for," the living stem that will itself
expand into the flower, which it now foreshews. How should it not be
so, even on grounds of natural reason, and the analogy of inferior
life? Is not nature prophetic up the whole vast pyramid of organic
being?
-- On the Constitution of
the Church and State |