Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN THE
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2026 10:16 pm
Iran DEVASTATES Trump's Strike Plan, Israel Prepares Total War | KJ Noh
Danny Haiphong
Streamed live 116 minutes ago #iranwar #trump #israel
Iran jusst foiled Trump's strike plan as Israel prepares for total war amid hysteria that a surprise attack is coming to Tel Aviv. KJ Noh joins to break down the myth from the reality in this must-watch show.
Transcript
Chapter 1: Escalation in West Asia Welcome back to the show everyone. Danny Hiong here. As you can see, I am joined by geopolitical analyst and commentator KJ know to go over the latest developments. KJ, I wanted to begin with this. So, uh the United States according to uh Iranian media has asked Iran for permission to strike Pickax Mountain uh without retaliation which Iran uh outright rejected. This
is according to IRIB media and Iran says that they are preparing for war within . Although uh Iran also has plans that could really hinder this in the in the next several days. Iran does plan to conduct an operation that will push the United States Navy further than the 500 kilometers away where they sit now as the USS Theodore Roosevelt is going to join the George W. B HW Bush and the
USS George Washington in the Arabian Sea in the coming days. Now, Israel has been very busy uh sounding the alarm. It's on high alert right now for what they fear is a preemptive strike from Iran. And they've kept their military at the highest readiness on all fronts and have actually deployed bomb shelters throughout the entity in Tel Aviv and Ashdod as it braces for what they think are going to be a
massive volley of missiles should this war restart. Now Iran is continuing to enforce its control over the straight of form as it has hit now ships near Saudi Arabia. This comes after hitting ports uh ships ported at the UAE as well as near Qatar in recent days. And the UK MTO has said that ships are no longer reporting that they are getting hit and that the numbers of ships hit in the
last uh several weeks to a month have probably been doubled in what we've heard. KJ, there's a lot going on uh in this part of the world and it is having impact on all parts of the world including increasing pressure on South Korea to extend a deployment of its forces usually stationed in the Gulf of Aden to the uh Gulf of Oman near the straight of Hormuz. What do you make of
what's happening right now as we sit on the scenes of the brink of uh major escalation? Well, to be blindingly obvious, certainly there's massive Chapter 2: US and Iranian positions escalation going on. Uh, as I've always said, and I will continue to say, Iran holds the upper hand. And the conditions that we have that are relatively stable. They're not, that is to say, they're not outright uh catastrophic war right now is
because of Iran's restraint. But it can certainly release some of that restraint as we're seeing with the increased attacks on the tankers. Not simply, you know, uh warning shots, but 3 minutesnow, you know, literally uh hitting them and sinking them. And so we've seen the ma largest number of uh tankers hit in the past few days, uh since, you know, the the start of the war. Uh the US is is uh
without good moves. Uh, as I've said before, it cannot do boots on the ground. It simply doesn't have the manpower and it would take at least a year to stage that manpower and to do a meaningful incursion. If it's talking about special forces, what could they do? That remains to be seen. But even that is very very challenging. uh if it wants to do some kind of symbolic stri strike on pickaxe
mountain uh I mean you can do a big you know fireworks display it's not going to make any difference and at this point Iran is signaling that it doesn't really have patience for these games anymore if you recall in the previous years the US would strike Iran would do a minimal response uh US got to claim that it was all powerful and that was the end of the story that story ended
uh in in the Ramadan war when Iran took off its gloves and showed that we can stand and we can hit back. We can fight back hard and the person who comes out the worst for that is the United States. So the US has retreated. Its ships, its bases have been wiped out. The strategic radars have been wiped out. It is no longer capable of doing the sorties that it is accustomed
to doing when it usually engages in air sea battle or airland battle against its opponents. So the US is in a difficult state. Uh yes it seems to be moving aircraft carriers into the region but again it's an unknown quantity. aircraft carriers. Uh all if there were all three aircraft carriers, they would be bringing about 180 200 uh planes uh to the frey. But even that is much much less than the
usual air power that the US is uh used to uh exercising that is uh to have total air dominance over space and it's an unknown quantity but you know Iran has signal that it is capable of hitting those aircraft carriers. So if the US were thinking carefully and understanding things from a strategic standpoint, it would be moving those aircraft carriers as far out of theater as possible. As for the Israeli response
and this language around preemptive strike, I don't think that uh Iran is in, you know, in in a mood for a preemptive strike. If a strike happens, it will be because Israel has attacked it. So all of this is uh simply more hysteria. We have an election coming up. Uh certainly it's in the interests of Liood and Netanyahu to restart active kinetic war to use that to rally uh its voters. Uh
and I think this notion of preemptive strike is is is both uh the a psychological operation and in preparation for a false flag as are the bomb shelters which largely serve as a visible and demonstrative uh scop. So all of this is to say that you know things are not looking good. As we discussed before South Korea had refused President Trump's demands to send troops to Iran. And this is traditionally where
the United States gets its cannon foder. It gets its cannon foders from proxies, but primarily South Korea has been a key provider of cannon foder. Uh during the Vietnam war, it sent uh 325,000 troops. The second largest deployment. During the Iraq war, uh it sent the second largest deployment. And this time once again it looked like the US was going to make the demand and South Korea would acquies. The current president
of progressive Ejyong has responded with an overt no. But we also know that South Korea already has troops in the United Arab Emirates, special warfare forces in the United Arab Emirates. And it also has the Chungh brigade which is a 4,400 ton destroyer along with planes and uh probably uh several companies size uh detachment and they have signaled that they could move its domain of uh of operations from the Gulf of
Aiden uh Chapter 3: Global reach and alliances into uh towards the Persian Gulf into the Gulf of Oman. So essentially it would be getting involved. Now this is actually against the South Korean constitution. You need co you need legislative approval to expand the scope of military operations overseas. But uh 8 minutesthey may be trying to uh you know look for a loophole and this kind of slow mission creep may be their
way of acquiescing to uh the US demand. So we'll see what happens. Yeah. Well, this was a report in the Cradle about it citing uh Kyongyang Shimmun newspaper talking about exactly what you just said. The Chiangghe antipiriracy unit which has been deployed in the Gulf of Aden since 2009 could expand and include the Gulf of Oman uh if uh this all goes through. But also KJ, you know, it's interesting to watch
the United States right now as Iran reportedly rejected a a permit. Imagine this, the United States asking permission uh to Iran to strike uh Pickax Mountain. This is very reminiscent of the 12-day war at the very end where there were suspicions and some reports although I don't think Iran ever confirmed this that the Trump administration had asked Iran also to stand down during the uh operation midnight hammer. But now we have
Pakistani waters uh serving the US Navy which uh has led some uh to question. Of course, Pakistan has tried to play a neutral role in the mediation, but nevertheless, the United States Navy is stationed there right now. Some believe to uh be part of a coming attack and that, you know, is I think indicative of something. KJ, what do you think it's indicative of? Again, this is having global ramifications and I
think what people thought they knew about how things were going are uh uh is is getting challenged right now uh as the United States tries to figure out what the hell to do here. Well, you know, again, to be obvious, it's a signal of desperation. Uh US going to Pakistan and trying to get their, you know, support. Pakistan, you know, will probably give partial support, but it's always been a kind of
a um it has always been um an unreliable ally. Uh the US has worked hard to pull Pakistan into its orbit because it's an important part of the global south. It is a strong or was a strong ally with China. Uh but remember, Imran Khan was deposed. is still rotting in prison and the current current administration is clearly balancing and on occasion supporting the United States. But at the end of the
day, I don't think it will make much of a difference. Certainly didn't make much of a difference in previous wars uh in in you know in West Asia. Uh and I think more than anything else this is really a sign of desperation. the US asking all around going around, you know, with its cup in hand, you know, my kingdom for a horse. They're looking for support anywhere they can get it. Yeah.
And to continue on um with desperation, the theme of desperation, it says right now the Israeli Air Force, according to Wet, Chapter 4: Military readiness and tactics Israeli media is on standby for immediate response, but again to potential Iranian attack. The IDF is advising Netanyahu not to strike for now as the defense industry, this is interesting, continues to produce more interceptors, munitions, unmanned aerial vehicles for the next conflict. This doesn't really
make any sense. Neither did those images of the bomb shelters. KJ, what could a bomb shelter do again? I mean, I guess if you're underground, you you'll be okay, but uh I I imagine a a missile could destroy those things. How how do you get out of it is the question. What's your thoughts on this? It did seem like a calculated scoff in my opinion just looking at those things. Well, they
I think they're essentially like large portaotties, you know. I mean, I don't think they're going to make uh any difference. Uh and they're probably about as effective as a portaotty. I've seen, you know, reinforced portaotties that look stronger than those quote unquote bomb shelters. I mean the thing is the key thing about uh sheltering uh is that it has to be in the ground or underground. You don't put a bomb shelter
on the street. That is just a publicity stunt. Uh I mean I suppose essentially it's better than lying flat on the ground. I mean, they're called mobile bomb shelters, too, which means you're not underground because you're you can be moved uh you can move these from one place to another, which doesn't seem to make any sense, but it it doesn't make any sense. But the the part that does make sense. I
mean, um once again, let's emphasize that Iran is not in the business of uh aggressive preemptive attacks. It it has not done that to date, although it would have every reason to do that. If it responds it will be because it has been attacked. Uh but again you know this is you know the use of a false flag to trigger war to uh you know shift the political uh uh atmosphere towards
the liquid party. I think that's what's going on right now. But the the truth here in that little report is that interceptors and the militaryindustrial uh uh backbone is severely weakened all across uh the US uh imperial uh uh empire and its vassels. And so the the lack of interceptors, the lack of hardware is probably a real issue that they are dealing with. And that's why there may be some, you know,
conflicting messages. Um interceptors uh we know were already severely depleted during the Ramadan war. Uh we certainly know that the US does not have the industrial capacity to build these back rapidly. It's even harder not only simply because the US has gutted out its own industrial base but also because uh many of these uh interceptors and precision missiles require rare earth elements which China is most certainly withholding. So it's a difficult
position for them but they too want some kind of theatrical demonstrative uh performative war so that they can uh achieve uh short-term political gains and I don't think Iran is going to oblige them on that you no and uh I you know Iran's definition of preemptive strike appears to be that if they get a sniff that an operation is underway they're going to strike first. But that but that still is defensive
in the sense that they are striking where that operation is going to originate from like they did uh uh last month when uh the you know when the bases in Jordan were struck first. So that appears to be what Iran will do. It's not going to just launch missiles at Israel because the world wants it to. Chapter 5: Economic impacts of the war So, and Danny that, you know, once war breaks
out, hitting military bases is completely legitimate. You don't we don't even have to classify that under preeemption. The US started a war, it had these bases uh and it gets and once you've started a war and you are a party to the war, your bases can be hit in war. Yeah. Yeah. And there this war is still very active. I mean there's not a theou has been torn up uh by Trump
himself. So that's there is nothing on paper that says uh this can't happen now. But KJ, I wanted to get your comments on this because I wanted to move a little bit into the economic consequences of all of what's been happening not just in West Asia but worldwide. This is a report. So the UK MTO uh released a report saying that they're struggling to accurately report true number of attacks with the
majority of vessels attacked refusing to report. So that means KJ that over 50% likely are not reporting at all what's what's going on in the straight of Hormuz and therefore the numbers that we're getting even though they are quite striking over 30 in the last two weeks are likely much smaller and we know that inflation is very high and Donald Trump is taking some pretty extreme measures for the US empire to
mitigate this economic concern and economic problems. We saw the diesel deal with Russia, but now he's easing sanctions on Russia and also mulling easing pressure on so-called Iranian shadow fleets uh amid this crisis. And this is part of that Lindsey Graham bill that has already been uh pushed through that saw like 500% tariffs on Russia and something ridiculous like that. So there's a lot of desperation here on the economic front. what
your comments on this, the economic front of all of this and and why it seems like this economic D-Day, this uh attempt to strike Iran and the world at the heart of the problem uh the Iranian economy seems to have just exploded into a global crisis. Well, I mean this was anticipated, right? I mean once you hit the global artery once you create a conflration in the global artery of uh hydrocarbons
you're going to get these results and once again let's emphasize it's not simply diesel or natural gas or petrol it's everything else that's related to the hydrocarbon industry ura ammonia sulfur uh napa etc all of these things create the essential structure of a modern capitalist society without them we can't function. So the pain and more pain is still yet to come. But the simple fact that for example, President 18 minutesTrump lifted
the Lindsey Graham sanctions shows how extraordinarily desperate the US is. I mean this will release anywhere between 3 to 11 days worth of diesel. But uh they'll take three today, 3 days or 11 days, whatever it is, they still need it. They need as much as possible. Of course, uh, you know, this boils back to, you know, the simple fact that when you in an electoral year, you're looking at the economy.
Everybody knows that it is the economy, stupid. And so, uh, the US is trying to do what it can. President Trump is trying to do what he can, but the desperation really signals extraordinary weakness of the US that it the extraordinary weak hand that it it has right now. uh and the fact that they're also trying to manipulate the market. Clearly, that is one part of the equation. The fact that ships
are refusing to report attacks again that shows that they are trying to cover their rear as well. But certainly, yeah, there more than 30 vessels that have been attacked. Uh and uh they're trying to keep, you know, it's like you're trying to keep your insurance rates low and you don't want to scare off uh customers. So they certainly have an incentive to not report the full picture. But the full picture we
get uh is we get it downstream. When we look at diesel prices, we look at uh inflation. When we go to the supermarket, we see the cost of everything has skyrocketed. And all of this is reversible if the US were simply to back down and back out. And it is not doing that because it is so deeply tied to its notion of hegemony and so deeply tied to its idea that it
has to control the global economy, the hydrocarbon flows and the financial structures that are undergurtded by the petro dollar. Chapter 6: Crisis in Saudi Arabia Yeah. And speaking of the petro dollar, while the United States and Israel are having a hard time figuring out when to strike Iran and what the consequences will be, Saudi Arabia is facing a major crisis. Yemen onsella hit the so-called presidential compound of the puppet government, I
believe in a den, and that has caused the massive death. And then the oil prices spiked yesterday and now we're getting reports that it did so likely because Saudi oil was being hit yesterday in the last two days quite hard. This is another problem for uh the United States hegemony. This is the petro dollar and KJ uh Saudi Arabia is now lashing out at Iran, China and Russia. It has blamed Iran
for breaking the normalization agreement brokered by China in 2023 because they're saying it's anala getting supplied by Iran and they're also pointing the finger at China too saying that uh Ansarala has been able to build a lot of its capacity because of Chinese assistance. Your your thoughts on this? It seems like a full circle kind of moment. It is a full circle but Saudi Arabia has nobody to blame but itself. the
fact that it is a quizzling of the United States and it took uh US direction to attack the airport on Sana and then uh unleash the war all over again. I mean it has nobody to blame but itself and its poor judgment and its quizzling obeisance to the United States. Uh I mean this was predictable and it is you know you have the two arteries of the global hydrocarbon flow the uh
you know the Babel Mandeb and the straight of Hormuz. Uh and when the straight of Hormuz essentially was closed down, South Korea was shifting its hydrocarbon flows through the east west pipeline uh 22 minutestowards uh the Red Sea. Uh and at the same time, this is the utter foolishness of it. It attacked uh Yemen uh the the Ansar Allah uh uh uh Ansar Allah group returning from Iran after the funeral of
the supreme leader. And so by reigniting the war, they put themselves uh into this uh quandry uh quagmire that they have no way getting out of. And of course, if you're fighting a war with a bunch of mercenaries, uh you are not going to prevail. I mean, essentially, when push comes to shove, uh motivated uh uh national military fighting against uh colonizing force, which is what Saudi Arabia is in Yemen, is
going to prevail. And so not only does uh Yemen not only has Yemen shown its military metal, it's shown its military uh strategic uh acumen and it has also shown its capacity to uh to to put tremendous pain on Saudi Arabia. on simply, you know, the attack on the presidential compound as well as, you know, the beating back along the coastline, but also the fact that it has, you know, shut down
the East West pipeline. It's attacked it multiple times. Uh, and we also know that it is capable of shutting down the Red Sea completely. In particular, if the Babel Mandeb is is shut down, Saudi Arabia will try and send oil through uh tankers can't go through the Sewish Canal, but they're trying to get uh oil out through terminals into the Mediterranean and then they'll do another four-week trip around the Horn, etc.
even that has been shown to be extremely vulnerable and I think those uh those targets uh will be knocked out and completely uh destroyed if Saudi Arabia continues to escalate. It will not if it doesn't come to the table and negotiate rapidly with Yemen. Saudi Arabia is in a very very bad place. Uh it is on the verge of collapse. uh the house of Saud which has been a US quizzling for
decades uh is no longer viable. Uh and I think the sooner they realize this, the sooner they come to grips with the reality, uh I think the better it will be for the rest of the world. In the meantime, Yemen controls uh the Babel Mandab, it controls the left artery, Iran controls the right artery. It's a very very uh you know it's a zukswang for the Saudis and they can lash out
all they want. They can lash out against China, against Iran, against the United States even. It's not going to make any difference. Uh geopolitical, geoeconomic, geo uh strategic realities make it so that Saudi Arabia does not have any good options left at this point. Chapter 7: China and Russia's role Yeah. Well, uh uh the I find it very interesting that the longer that these wars go on now, both uh in West
Asia, the war in Iran and the war against Sansar, which is being both of which are facing big problems. KJ, um I find it very interesting that China, Russia, they're getting lumped in, they're getting pulled back into the narrative by the empire and its various uh uh you know um attendant forces. Like for example, the UK. Look at I mean this unrepentant racism like putting this they put up this picture to
try to make Ensural look like they're some kind of uh hysterical uh you know uh aggressive force uh with the zoomed-in picture. But essentially, Telegraph is reporting here that China is supporting the Iranbacked Houthis on as a way to pressure the United States saying that the militant group is seeking a medium-range ballistic missile, the Kyber Shakan missile that Iran has uh which would be made with Chinese components, saying that a ship
last year that was intercepted um and off the Red Sea had uh Chinese components in it that could build uh that could build this missile. What what do you make of this? Because what we see I think is the United States in terms of its actual policy and the collective west uh uh very much very disjointed now on Russia and China in terms of how it looks apparently. The Trump administration meeting
with she uh easing economic sanctions on Russia seemingly all because this is necessary for for the moment. But at the same time, the combined west, the collective west has not at at all as a whole uh dialed back at all. Now they're actually trying to include China and Russia in some kind of cold war fantasy in West Asia. So your thoughts on this, KJ? What 27 minutesdo you make of these reports
that China is aiding and abetting on Sarala? I think much of the world will think that's cool, but what do you make of the uh the actual reality of it? I mean, we don't know. We don't know the exact dimension. Certainly, you know, China has been supporting Iran, certainly Iran's sovereignty, uh certainly with uh certain types of intelligence. The actual details further than that, we don't know. But as you point out,
it's probably what most of the world would support as well as you know the support of Ansar Allah. What we do know is that Ansurah's missile technology comes with comes from North Korea. uh and so you know North Korea and Ansar Allah have um and Yemen uh initially South Yemen but including you know the uh the resistance now uh they are uh strongly supported by North Korean technology and North Korean strategy.
This is the entire you know uh geographic uh dispersion and uh tunnel warfare that both Iran and Yemen and Allah have been using. uh it does look disjointed because the US is trying to see if it can work uh with its enemies because it's trying to deal with the immediate pressures of the war that it triggered in West Asia. Uh and for them ultimately these wars are interconnected. Essentially they're interconnected in
the sense that these are all decolonial wars. their wars where countries are trying to regain uh national sovereignty. They're trying to liberate themselves from the global US empire. And so in in that sense they're uh they are connected and from the standpoint of the US of course from the standpoint of the hgeimon uh they want to repress any uh you know counter uh counterhmonic movements. So certainly they want to blame. I
wouldn't put much uh you know trust in the telegraph. They they are a tabloid. They say anything that comes to mind. Uh they are you know utter and shameless uh propagandists. Uh the the Chapter 8: US control over South Korea the the more dangerous propagandists are the ones that seem plausible and uh people think oh yeah that sounds about right. And they go for that. So anything that you see in the
telegraph you can you know toss it in in the waste bin it doesn't mean anything but it is true that you know there is a core uh strength of the multipolar world which is the cranks you know it's China Russia Iran and North Korea and they form the kind of hard uh forceful backbone which can hit back if necessary and certainly they may be giving certainly moral support if not other support
to other uh liberation movements around the global south. Yeah. Well uh great points KJ. Now uh you know maybe you can talk more about the I know you wrote a recent piece in counter punch on the US uh controlling South Korea's military uh operational controller opcon. And maybe you can elaborate on this. It seems like the overall the United States is really trying to rely on those forces in the world that
it still has I guess you could say both formally with this case of South Korea uh but also informally in other countries as well like operational control trying its hardest to rely on these forces in order to achieve objectives uh against Iran and then of course in the bigger scene Russia and China, but lots of problems are emerging. Are are problems emerging in this case too with South Korea, KJ? What um
maybe you can talk more about that and how it reflects the broader world situation that we find ourselves in. Yeah, there they there there have always been problems about this issue and it's a kind of a mind-boggling thing if you really stop and think about it. But the United States controls South Korea's military and that is an abrogation of sovereignty which is unheard of in modern history that uh quote unquote a
sovereign state has its military its entire military 500,000 troops plus 3.1 million troops 3.6 million troops are controlled by the United States. It's like one of those things where people think I can't believe it. You know, it's it's does this still exist in the current uh modern age. The answer is yes. And the reason for it is uh 76 years ago uh the US took control of South Korea's military during the
Korean War, which uh most informed historians think was triggered by South Korea. But anyway, it still controls South Korea's military to this day. And this is just mind-boggling because it's known that militaries will try and create a unified command. If there are multiple militaries fighting together, they will create a unified command and they'll do that by uh transferring opcon. Uh but that is done very very rapidly and then once war ends
it is released back to the sovereign country because you know you don't want to hold on to another country's military forever. In Korea, it's lasted over, as I said, over 76 years. And South Korea's asked for its opcon back repeatedly. This is the thing that tells you that South Korea is a US vassel because it's asked over and over and over again. It's been over three decades since it's asked for it
back. And the US has always delayed, filibustered, waffled, and moved the goal points goalpost. So most recently the US signaled that there's going to be more delay and Javier Brunson who is the USFK commander, CNC commander, CFC commander essentially the person who controls South Korean troops has said security conditions have changed and we cannot return opcon on a timeline. It has to be conditions bound and those conditions have changed which the
South Korean uh government has taken to mean that that means never. So anyway, samyong when he came to power the current president said that OBON needed to be returned to him before the end of his term in 2030. Uh and Bernson has said there can be no timeline. In other words, 76 years is not enough uh is never good enough for you. South Korea originally set deadlines for the return of Opcon.
Uh in 2003, the US agreed it would return by 2012. And then in 2010, suddenly there was this massive escalation on the peninsula. Uh uh Korean ship was sunk and all of a sudden Opcon became, you know, you couldn't transfer Opcon anymore. And then they said uh in 2014 2017 we will return them on a conditionsbased uh uh if certain conditions are met and those conditions are essentially can South Korea defend
itself does it have interoperability etc. All of the answer to all of those questions is yes. It's yes yesterday. But there's a third clause which essentially says are the conditions stable enough for opcon transfer. And this is the catch 22. This is the thing that's designed to undermine the transfer or the return of opcon because if you say that there has to be a conducive security environment that is to say literally
the security environment on the Korean peninsula and in the broader region i.e. China must be stable and conducive to a safe uninterrupted transfer. That's the catch 22. So you know they say it's conditionsbased. we say you have to pass certain tests but if conditions are stable then they won't do the tests uh because these are tied to field exercises that they don't that they deescalate when they don't feel they don't need
them but if they do and the conditions are escalated North Korea responds very badly to field war games then you know the tensions have been increased and then the security conditions are not met it's not safe to transfer so this is a formula for ensuring Opcon is never transferred. But I really want to highlight that it does not take 20, 30 years to transfer opcon in wartime. Opcon is simply signed over
rapidly and it's returned rapidly. That's what it that's what should happen. But it's not being returned because the US requires or wants South Korean troops to wage war against China. 3.6 six million troops is a lot of cannon foder and they do not want to give that up and that is the key reason why the United States is holding on to opcon for DI. It's trying to create these kind of weird
Rube Goldberg structures where it's trying to have parallel and a horizontal command and it's trying to do these Rub Goldberg carveouts and there is already a Rube Goldberg carveout because um they say that well you know we don't really control South Korean opcon we only have wartime opcon that's actually a nonsense statement Because operational control means operations are warfighting. So essentially they're saying we only have wartime war fighting control. That's a
tautology. It's a pleonazm. The only time control of the military matters is during fighting just as the only time you know control of a car matters is when you're steering it and it's moving. So this notion that they have returned peace time. They say they returned in 1994. They returned peacetime opcon to South Korea. This is a booby prize. It's like one of those toy steering wheels that you stick on the
dashboard for children so they can pretend they're steering while somebody actually drives. You know, it's a political toy. So, it gives the illusion of control, but it means nothing. And the simple fact is that the US will not transfer OPCON because it doesn't share command. When you say joint control, shared command, the US never shares control, will not share control with a South Korean general. So, you know, essentially, uh, it's a
fraud. And you also know it's a fraud because the US gets to decide when is peace time and when is wartime, right? If you if you decide when the car is driven and who gets to drive it, it's your car and only you can drive it. If that's the case, then it's not it's it's it's that person's car and anybody who, you know, spends time around it when it's still in the
garage, they are the maintenance crew. It's essentially if one party decides who gets control when it has control, then it's they have control. And so this notion that it only has wartime opcon is a red herring. You know, you slice the cake, you decide which portion to take, and you decide when to eat it. It's your bloody cake. So the US is holding on to OPCON. It needs control over Korean troops
because it's planning for war with China in the Pacific. It wants the cannon fodder, 3.6 million troops. South Korea is one of the most powerful the most advanced militaries in the world the fifth most powerful in the milit in the world and it also has unlike many other countries it has the defense industrial base to sustain it and on top of that South Koreans have always fought in US wars more military-aged
men saw fighting in Vietnam than Americans as a portion of the population and it was the third largest deployment to Iraq so The US avoids a draft because South Korea has one. Uh, and this notion that it doesn't control OPCON is just a political stunt. It really has to do with the embarrassment when South Korean troops massacred civilians in Guangju in 1980 and since then or before then and since then they've
been involved in multiple military coups and coup attempts. The US 40 minuteswants that kind of, you know, plausible deniability at the same time that it still wants to control South Korea's military as a proxy for war. So you get this crazy quilt of parallel unified command structures, multiple command authorities, phased operating assessments, and you have this Frankenstein cobbled leadership structure, but essentially they want their cake and to eat it too. and
they're assisted by farright factions uh in South Korea who have lashed themselves to the US empire and they see any loss of uh US control as loss of their own power and status and so there's a vast nexus of quizzlings and subcontractors to US empire that are used as the pretext where they say oh well South Korea wants to wants to keep us there it's like all goes every time the US
says you know we are in a certain country because they want us to be there that's absolute nonsense the same thing with those who claim that South Korea wants the US to you know maintain opcon that the Koreans don't want to US to give up opcon that's a kind of a nonsense colonial propaganda but uh the real risk here is that US is using its proxies it does not want to give
out its proxies and that signals that the US has not given up any of its ambitions for war with China and so uh it is a very very dangerous situation. Ibach is trying hard to reclaim OPCON. Let's hope he does that in a real substantive fashion. But if he doesn't, it will be catastrophic because it means that US has a license and a kind of you know moral hazard uh that it
will use to escalate to war against China. What's uh so striking about this KJ, we've in this show so far, we've talked about, you know, strike plans against Iran, Ansarala, a really disastrous war there, and now we're talking about the United States uh empire uh having a difficult time utilize or or at least achieving anything uh through its proxies, but still wanting that control so so deep into the game of trying
to control uh its proxies that it even tries to treat Iran as a proxy and say, "Oh, let us strike uh let us strike you." It's so I feel like we've come to the point where there's just so much desperation and also the thirst for power and of course uh the longer that failures kind of mount uh the more uh intense this push uh for dominance and control becomes not least because
the the opposite is just completely intolerable. And now there are consequences that I that we don't often get to talk about, but maybe we can on the economic front. We often talk about runaway inflation. We often talk Chapter 9: Unrest in France about the oil crisis and the price of oil and all of this, but really those are just the symptoms of a massive problem uh with an the economic foundations of
this empire. And uh we have massive protests in France which uh are engulfing the country. We have Emanuel Mcronone commenting today on these saying there's no room for violence on our republic. Those who have broken and attacked prefectures business looted our town halls will be prosecuted and punished to law enforcement forces. Guarantees of the right to demon guaranters of the right to demonstrate. I express the support of the nation. We will
stand against the sers of chaos who seek to bring down our institutions and prevent those who peacefully express their demands from doing so. Referencing the student uh protests that are happening there. KJ, Time magazine, I didn't even want to read this because Time magazine is a is a rag for the neocons. But why is France burning? Why is it that there is this revolt in France, KJ? And what does it say
about the overall foundations of this empire? because it's the United States at the head, but it's a it's a system that encompasses the West and they're supposed to be driving it toward uh their aims and objectives and the consequences of it economically almost entirely focus on things like inflation and the oil crisis, but it's much deeper than that. And so I want please uh help us understand what's going on here and
what does it reflect? Well, inflation and collapse of living standards are surface phenomena of the deep contradictions of capitalism. But most uh notably in the case of France, it's the neoliberal austerity that the government is trying to force on the people. Uh it has to, you know, cough up uh somewhere in the range. It it wants to cut about uh 48 billion dollars uh from social services from uh a system that
is already cut to the bone which you see for example in French schools where one out of 10 teachers is missing uh you know the classrooms are falling to pieces students are being warehoused their toilets are overflowing and the rats and uh rats are running around and there's you know no air conditioning in the summer and no heat in the winter. So all of this is uh these are legitimate claims for
the students to protest. And in the past, for example, in the 1990s when they came out with these legitimate demands, the government would actually make reasonable accommodation. They cannot do that anymore because they are firmly set on this road of austerity because they are dealing with massive war costs. uh France has already committed $23 billion to Ukraine and those costs are going to continue to increase at the same time that it
is 112% uh you know national debt. So it cannot balance the books and essentially it is cutting things to the bone and the French people are not going to take it. Most certainly the students are expressing what they feel is legitimate in quote unquote a democracy. But the bigger and deeper picture of it is not simply that the war is draining the coffers of all European states because the US has demanded
that they spend 5% of GDP on on the military. That's that's a target that they cannot meet. For decades they were unable to meet 2%. How are they going to meet 5% targets? And at the same time, you see as the multipolar world is arising and it is completing the process of decolonization, France is no longer able to do the kind of one-sided unfair colonial extraction that it was capable of doing.
Remember, France controlled about a third of Africa. Its wealth came from colonies in Africa and Southeast Asia, etc. you know Michelin you know the Michelin the tire company those were those were you know rubber plantations essentially slave plantations in Southeast Asia etc. So French culture and French power and French wealth is built on colonial extraction. And now that the process of decolonization is happening in concrete ways in the African countries for
example, France is struggling and is facing a severe crisis in economic conditions is I would say it's facing an existential crisis. And so add to that the internal contradictions where it can no longer uh sustain the conditions of living that it used to pay off a labor aristocracy then you are going to get those contradictions bubbling to the four in terms of mass protest. Now when Macron says there is no room
for violence, he's lying through his teeth because we know that uh what he's imposing on the vast majority of peaceful protesters is mass police violence. The sers of chaos are actually the police. But he's doubling down on this fascistic violence because essentially uh France is reverting to its fascistic roots. Anybody who spent time in France knows that there is a deep uh strain of right-wing fascism inside the French body politic and
he's tapping right back into that and he's using quote unquote the forces of orders where you know these uh fascistic tendencies are concentrated and using them to see if he can bash enough heads uh so that the French will uh you know uh will you know will will submit well you France asumse has said no we will not submit these are reasonable demands uh we need to claim back our country uh
and the students are uh students not simply now the high school students but also some university students are joining uh they're also being joined by the yellow vest you know which is a worker uh rebellion or worker resistance and so I think Macron has a very very dangerous powder keg on his hands is he going to double down further on this militaristic uh violence and repression. It's very possible. I think most
European countries have reverted to greater or lesser degrees, I would say greater degrees of fascism in tamping down their terminal contradictions. I mean, fascism is simply capitalism in decline. Uh but I think uh things are going to get much much worse both for Macron but also unfortunately for the French people. Well, there are some scenes coming out right now we can take a look at. Here is some of the videos coming
out of uh Chapter 10: Terminal decline and activism protesters and uh what some are calling rioters uh um attacking the police essentially because as you said uh the police have been attacking them. I mean that there is a long history of that you can simply see. And then there's also uh supposedly protesters are marching toward the presidential palace uh in France right now. Um many declaring that mcronism as it's been called.
Uh disastrous dastardly word in my opinion, but mcronism is is essentially over. But it seems like it's been that way for a while. KJ, the what this reflects to me it seems is something that's happening across the Combined West and even the United States. the legitimacy of these governments are is not just waning but essentially collapsing to zero. And uh it's so interesting to see these scenes that are reminiscent of what
they uh you know the neocons imperialists they try to paint onto Iran, China, uh Russia. They try to say oh there these countries are so unstable and they repress their own populations. The scenes coming out of France seem to indicate that that is more true for the combined west itself and we know what the US does when there are massive protests here. Your uh your thoughts on this the uh the scenes
coming out are are only going to get worse it seems as uh you know France there's a history here. France tends to uh at least in the west uh people there tend to really uh uh move fast and hard when uh things like this emerge. Your thoughts? Well, you know, as I've you know, as we know, France has a history of revolution and revolt. In 1789, in May 1968, the uh coalition
of workers and students actually brought down the government. Uh so France has a history of rebellion and resistance. uh but uh in this this time round I think that it is not going to be as easy as it was in 1968 or in uh 1995 or other periods where uh you know protests were able to protesters were able to get real uh concessions or even substantive you know uh change in the
structure of the political economy. I think the key thing to remember is in 2008 Nicholas Sarosi was the president uh and he said one of the few accurate things that he uh that he ever uttered was he said capitalism is finished and he understood that because when the global economy financial system collapsed in 2008 he understood that was the deathnell of capitalism and that's when everybody should have been pivoting towards a
different type of political economy. Instead, they doubled down on neoliberal austerity. And we've had just a series, a succession of neoliberal reforms in France where things are simply getting paired closer and closer to the bone. The muscle and the senu have been shaved off and now we're scraping marrow. And the French can't go on that way indefinitely. It's also tied to the fact the loss of the imperial extraction, the unfair uh
you know uh extraction from the colonies. All of this have created uh chaos and deep fundamental 54 minutescontradictions in France metropol, you know, the the the center of uh colonial France. Uh and it's also been aggravated by this war against Russia. Now originally the war against Russia was actually another type of imperial expansion. They would you know uh destroy Russia and then they would carve it out and it would be another
you know colonial uh uh uh uh boondoggle or windfall. Uh Russia has fought back. They are losing the war against Russia this proxy war using Ukraine. And so conditions are simply getting harder and harder. And so you know you know just the symbolism of plus dulla publique where the revolution itself uh was declared uh I think that is important but the French uh system is heading towards terminal collapse as are the
systems of most of the European 55 minutescountries not just France Spain UK Germany uh all of them are facing critical structural crisis uh and there's no good way out of it. And instead of fundamentally transforming their political economy, uh they've lashed themselves down to further neoliberal austerity, further destruction of their social welfare net, and further uh doubling down on war. That is, they're going to put, you know, billions uh uh billions
into the war, billions into Ukraine. uh and they're not going to and they're going to defund uh most of their uh education and other services. This is an act of madness. But this is what the ruling imperial class want. This is how they think. Uh the simple fact is that you know it's it's like being addicted to a drug. Hegemany is one hell of a drug and they simply cannot let go
of it. They will rather destroy everything uh than let go of their uh addiction to power. Well, KJ, it's been a great show today. I think uh that might be a good place to end it. Uh everyone should hit the like button before you go. That helps boost the show in the algorithm. Uh KJ, do you have any final words before we head out? Uh any anything we didn't get to hit
on? Well, um I just want to do just another plug for the taxpayer uprising that Code Pink is leading in November 10, November 10th to November 12th in Washington DC. This 3 days of peaceful protest and resistance. So essentially they're saying, you know, we have a $1.5 trillion war budget, probably closer to 1.3 uh 2.3 trillion, but at least on paper, $ 1.5 trillion war budget. And that is gutting our society.
Just as it's gutting France and Europe, it is also gutting our society. We feel it. All we have to do is look around in our environment. We see the incredible imiseration, hopelessness, homelessness. You know, uh over 1.5% of the US population lives in absolute poverty. 40% do not have $500 to their name. 60% do not have $1,000 to their name. The miseration is getting worse and worse. And a large part of
it is because we are endlessly manufacturing enemies uh Iran, China, Russia and endlessly spending our national wealth on wars. And so this is a demand that uh uh CodePink is making to put pressure on Congress as is our democratic right to the extent that it still exists is to you know put pressure on the incoming Congress and put the politicians of both parties including the Democrats on notice that they have to
turn around this war making greed-driven echocidal ship around. uh and uh and I think that this is really really important. It's gone, you know, it's supported by most of the major uh peace uh and social justice organizations. Uh and you can go to code pink uh and look for the taxpayer uprising and give your support to It's one of the concrete things that we can do in this terrible terrible moment where
everything is hitting the fan and we are confused as to what to do. This is one very very concrete action that everybody can take right and um I published this link in the video description below uh which you can find which will describe what it is what KJ just described here a campaign that's very important uh we should all support it um you could go you know you could sign up you
could donate you could volunteer participate online whatever you want to do but the link in the video description is below after the show so hit the like button everybody that helps boost the show in YouTube's algorithm. And also, I'll find all the place to support this channel in the video description below, too. Patreon, substack, and much more. Tomorrow, I'll be back 1 p.m. Eastern time with Professor Muhammad Morandi. I'll see you
all then, 1:00 p.m. Eastern time. Until next time.
Danny Haiphong
Streamed live 116 minutes ago #iranwar #trump #israel
Iran jusst foiled Trump's strike plan as Israel prepares for total war amid hysteria that a surprise attack is coming to Tel Aviv. KJ Noh joins to break down the myth from the reality in this must-watch show.
Transcript
Chapter 1: Escalation in West Asia Welcome back to the show everyone. Danny Hiong here. As you can see, I am joined by geopolitical analyst and commentator KJ know to go over the latest developments. KJ, I wanted to begin with this. So, uh the United States according to uh Iranian media has asked Iran for permission to strike Pickax Mountain uh without retaliation which Iran uh outright rejected. This
is according to IRIB media and Iran says that they are preparing for war within . Although uh Iran also has plans that could really hinder this in the in the next several days. Iran does plan to conduct an operation that will push the United States Navy further than the 500 kilometers away where they sit now as the USS Theodore Roosevelt is going to join the George W. B HW Bush and the
USS George Washington in the Arabian Sea in the coming days. Now, Israel has been very busy uh sounding the alarm. It's on high alert right now for what they fear is a preemptive strike from Iran. And they've kept their military at the highest readiness on all fronts and have actually deployed bomb shelters throughout the entity in Tel Aviv and Ashdod as it braces for what they think are going to be a
massive volley of missiles should this war restart. Now Iran is continuing to enforce its control over the straight of form as it has hit now ships near Saudi Arabia. This comes after hitting ports uh ships ported at the UAE as well as near Qatar in recent days. And the UK MTO has said that ships are no longer reporting that they are getting hit and that the numbers of ships hit in the
last uh several weeks to a month have probably been doubled in what we've heard. KJ, there's a lot going on uh in this part of the world and it is having impact on all parts of the world including increasing pressure on South Korea to extend a deployment of its forces usually stationed in the Gulf of Aden to the uh Gulf of Oman near the straight of Hormuz. What do you make of
what's happening right now as we sit on the scenes of the brink of uh major escalation? Well, to be blindingly obvious, certainly there's massive Chapter 2: US and Iranian positions escalation going on. Uh, as I've always said, and I will continue to say, Iran holds the upper hand. And the conditions that we have that are relatively stable. They're not, that is to say, they're not outright uh catastrophic war right now is
because of Iran's restraint. But it can certainly release some of that restraint as we're seeing with the increased attacks on the tankers. Not simply, you know, uh warning shots, but 3 minutesnow, you know, literally uh hitting them and sinking them. And so we've seen the ma largest number of uh tankers hit in the past few days, uh since, you know, the the start of the war. Uh the US is is uh
without good moves. Uh, as I've said before, it cannot do boots on the ground. It simply doesn't have the manpower and it would take at least a year to stage that manpower and to do a meaningful incursion. If it's talking about special forces, what could they do? That remains to be seen. But even that is very very challenging. uh if it wants to do some kind of symbolic stri strike on pickaxe
mountain uh I mean you can do a big you know fireworks display it's not going to make any difference and at this point Iran is signaling that it doesn't really have patience for these games anymore if you recall in the previous years the US would strike Iran would do a minimal response uh US got to claim that it was all powerful and that was the end of the story that story ended
uh in in the Ramadan war when Iran took off its gloves and showed that we can stand and we can hit back. We can fight back hard and the person who comes out the worst for that is the United States. So the US has retreated. Its ships, its bases have been wiped out. The strategic radars have been wiped out. It is no longer capable of doing the sorties that it is accustomed
to doing when it usually engages in air sea battle or airland battle against its opponents. So the US is in a difficult state. Uh yes it seems to be moving aircraft carriers into the region but again it's an unknown quantity. aircraft carriers. Uh all if there were all three aircraft carriers, they would be bringing about 180 200 uh planes uh to the frey. But even that is much much less than the
usual air power that the US is uh used to uh exercising that is uh to have total air dominance over space and it's an unknown quantity but you know Iran has signal that it is capable of hitting those aircraft carriers. So if the US were thinking carefully and understanding things from a strategic standpoint, it would be moving those aircraft carriers as far out of theater as possible. As for the Israeli response
and this language around preemptive strike, I don't think that uh Iran is in, you know, in in a mood for a preemptive strike. If a strike happens, it will be because Israel has attacked it. So all of this is uh simply more hysteria. We have an election coming up. Uh certainly it's in the interests of Liood and Netanyahu to restart active kinetic war to use that to rally uh its voters. Uh
and I think this notion of preemptive strike is is is both uh the a psychological operation and in preparation for a false flag as are the bomb shelters which largely serve as a visible and demonstrative uh scop. So all of this is to say that you know things are not looking good. As we discussed before South Korea had refused President Trump's demands to send troops to Iran. And this is traditionally where
the United States gets its cannon foder. It gets its cannon foders from proxies, but primarily South Korea has been a key provider of cannon foder. Uh during the Vietnam war, it sent uh 325,000 troops. The second largest deployment. During the Iraq war, uh it sent the second largest deployment. And this time once again it looked like the US was going to make the demand and South Korea would acquies. The current president
of progressive Ejyong has responded with an overt no. But we also know that South Korea already has troops in the United Arab Emirates, special warfare forces in the United Arab Emirates. And it also has the Chungh brigade which is a 4,400 ton destroyer along with planes and uh probably uh several companies size uh detachment and they have signaled that they could move its domain of uh of operations from the Gulf of
Aiden uh Chapter 3: Global reach and alliances into uh towards the Persian Gulf into the Gulf of Oman. So essentially it would be getting involved. Now this is actually against the South Korean constitution. You need co you need legislative approval to expand the scope of military operations overseas. But uh 8 minutesthey may be trying to uh you know look for a loophole and this kind of slow mission creep may be their
way of acquiescing to uh the US demand. So we'll see what happens. Yeah. Well, this was a report in the Cradle about it citing uh Kyongyang Shimmun newspaper talking about exactly what you just said. The Chiangghe antipiriracy unit which has been deployed in the Gulf of Aden since 2009 could expand and include the Gulf of Oman uh if uh this all goes through. But also KJ, you know, it's interesting to watch
the United States right now as Iran reportedly rejected a a permit. Imagine this, the United States asking permission uh to Iran to strike uh Pickax Mountain. This is very reminiscent of the 12-day war at the very end where there were suspicions and some reports although I don't think Iran ever confirmed this that the Trump administration had asked Iran also to stand down during the uh operation midnight hammer. But now we have
Pakistani waters uh serving the US Navy which uh has led some uh to question. Of course, Pakistan has tried to play a neutral role in the mediation, but nevertheless, the United States Navy is stationed there right now. Some believe to uh be part of a coming attack and that, you know, is I think indicative of something. KJ, what do you think it's indicative of? Again, this is having global ramifications and I
think what people thought they knew about how things were going are uh uh is is getting challenged right now uh as the United States tries to figure out what the hell to do here. Well, you know, again, to be obvious, it's a signal of desperation. Uh US going to Pakistan and trying to get their, you know, support. Pakistan, you know, will probably give partial support, but it's always been a kind of
a um it has always been um an unreliable ally. Uh the US has worked hard to pull Pakistan into its orbit because it's an important part of the global south. It is a strong or was a strong ally with China. Uh but remember, Imran Khan was deposed. is still rotting in prison and the current current administration is clearly balancing and on occasion supporting the United States. But at the end of the
day, I don't think it will make much of a difference. Certainly didn't make much of a difference in previous wars uh in in you know in West Asia. Uh and I think more than anything else this is really a sign of desperation. the US asking all around going around, you know, with its cup in hand, you know, my kingdom for a horse. They're looking for support anywhere they can get it. Yeah.
And to continue on um with desperation, the theme of desperation, it says right now the Israeli Air Force, according to Wet, Chapter 4: Military readiness and tactics Israeli media is on standby for immediate response, but again to potential Iranian attack. The IDF is advising Netanyahu not to strike for now as the defense industry, this is interesting, continues to produce more interceptors, munitions, unmanned aerial vehicles for the next conflict. This doesn't really
make any sense. Neither did those images of the bomb shelters. KJ, what could a bomb shelter do again? I mean, I guess if you're underground, you you'll be okay, but uh I I imagine a a missile could destroy those things. How how do you get out of it is the question. What's your thoughts on this? It did seem like a calculated scoff in my opinion just looking at those things. Well, they
I think they're essentially like large portaotties, you know. I mean, I don't think they're going to make uh any difference. Uh and they're probably about as effective as a portaotty. I've seen, you know, reinforced portaotties that look stronger than those quote unquote bomb shelters. I mean the thing is the key thing about uh sheltering uh is that it has to be in the ground or underground. You don't put a bomb shelter
on the street. That is just a publicity stunt. Uh I mean I suppose essentially it's better than lying flat on the ground. I mean, they're called mobile bomb shelters, too, which means you're not underground because you're you can be moved uh you can move these from one place to another, which doesn't seem to make any sense, but it it doesn't make any sense. But the the part that does make sense. I
mean, um once again, let's emphasize that Iran is not in the business of uh aggressive preemptive attacks. It it has not done that to date, although it would have every reason to do that. If it responds it will be because it has been attacked. Uh but again you know this is you know the use of a false flag to trigger war to uh you know shift the political uh uh atmosphere towards
the liquid party. I think that's what's going on right now. But the the truth here in that little report is that interceptors and the militaryindustrial uh uh backbone is severely weakened all across uh the US uh imperial uh uh empire and its vassels. And so the the lack of interceptors, the lack of hardware is probably a real issue that they are dealing with. And that's why there may be some, you know,
conflicting messages. Um interceptors uh we know were already severely depleted during the Ramadan war. Uh we certainly know that the US does not have the industrial capacity to build these back rapidly. It's even harder not only simply because the US has gutted out its own industrial base but also because uh many of these uh interceptors and precision missiles require rare earth elements which China is most certainly withholding. So it's a difficult
position for them but they too want some kind of theatrical demonstrative uh performative war so that they can uh achieve uh short-term political gains and I don't think Iran is going to oblige them on that you no and uh I you know Iran's definition of preemptive strike appears to be that if they get a sniff that an operation is underway they're going to strike first. But that but that still is defensive
in the sense that they are striking where that operation is going to originate from like they did uh uh last month when uh the you know when the bases in Jordan were struck first. So that appears to be what Iran will do. It's not going to just launch missiles at Israel because the world wants it to. Chapter 5: Economic impacts of the war So, and Danny that, you know, once war breaks
out, hitting military bases is completely legitimate. You don't we don't even have to classify that under preeemption. The US started a war, it had these bases uh and it gets and once you've started a war and you are a party to the war, your bases can be hit in war. Yeah. Yeah. And there this war is still very active. I mean there's not a theou has been torn up uh by Trump
himself. So that's there is nothing on paper that says uh this can't happen now. But KJ, I wanted to get your comments on this because I wanted to move a little bit into the economic consequences of all of what's been happening not just in West Asia but worldwide. This is a report. So the UK MTO uh released a report saying that they're struggling to accurately report true number of attacks with the
majority of vessels attacked refusing to report. So that means KJ that over 50% likely are not reporting at all what's what's going on in the straight of Hormuz and therefore the numbers that we're getting even though they are quite striking over 30 in the last two weeks are likely much smaller and we know that inflation is very high and Donald Trump is taking some pretty extreme measures for the US empire to
mitigate this economic concern and economic problems. We saw the diesel deal with Russia, but now he's easing sanctions on Russia and also mulling easing pressure on so-called Iranian shadow fleets uh amid this crisis. And this is part of that Lindsey Graham bill that has already been uh pushed through that saw like 500% tariffs on Russia and something ridiculous like that. So there's a lot of desperation here on the economic front. what
your comments on this, the economic front of all of this and and why it seems like this economic D-Day, this uh attempt to strike Iran and the world at the heart of the problem uh the Iranian economy seems to have just exploded into a global crisis. Well, I mean this was anticipated, right? I mean once you hit the global artery once you create a conflration in the global artery of uh hydrocarbons
you're going to get these results and once again let's emphasize it's not simply diesel or natural gas or petrol it's everything else that's related to the hydrocarbon industry ura ammonia sulfur uh napa etc all of these things create the essential structure of a modern capitalist society without them we can't function. So the pain and more pain is still yet to come. But the simple fact that for example, President 18 minutesTrump lifted
the Lindsey Graham sanctions shows how extraordinarily desperate the US is. I mean this will release anywhere between 3 to 11 days worth of diesel. But uh they'll take three today, 3 days or 11 days, whatever it is, they still need it. They need as much as possible. Of course, uh, you know, this boils back to, you know, the simple fact that when you in an electoral year, you're looking at the economy.
Everybody knows that it is the economy, stupid. And so, uh, the US is trying to do what it can. President Trump is trying to do what he can, but the desperation really signals extraordinary weakness of the US that it the extraordinary weak hand that it it has right now. uh and the fact that they're also trying to manipulate the market. Clearly, that is one part of the equation. The fact that ships
are refusing to report attacks again that shows that they are trying to cover their rear as well. But certainly, yeah, there more than 30 vessels that have been attacked. Uh and uh they're trying to keep, you know, it's like you're trying to keep your insurance rates low and you don't want to scare off uh customers. So they certainly have an incentive to not report the full picture. But the full picture we
get uh is we get it downstream. When we look at diesel prices, we look at uh inflation. When we go to the supermarket, we see the cost of everything has skyrocketed. And all of this is reversible if the US were simply to back down and back out. And it is not doing that because it is so deeply tied to its notion of hegemony and so deeply tied to its idea that it
has to control the global economy, the hydrocarbon flows and the financial structures that are undergurtded by the petro dollar. Chapter 6: Crisis in Saudi Arabia Yeah. And speaking of the petro dollar, while the United States and Israel are having a hard time figuring out when to strike Iran and what the consequences will be, Saudi Arabia is facing a major crisis. Yemen onsella hit the so-called presidential compound of the puppet government, I
believe in a den, and that has caused the massive death. And then the oil prices spiked yesterday and now we're getting reports that it did so likely because Saudi oil was being hit yesterday in the last two days quite hard. This is another problem for uh the United States hegemony. This is the petro dollar and KJ uh Saudi Arabia is now lashing out at Iran, China and Russia. It has blamed Iran
for breaking the normalization agreement brokered by China in 2023 because they're saying it's anala getting supplied by Iran and they're also pointing the finger at China too saying that uh Ansarala has been able to build a lot of its capacity because of Chinese assistance. Your your thoughts on this? It seems like a full circle kind of moment. It is a full circle but Saudi Arabia has nobody to blame but itself. the
fact that it is a quizzling of the United States and it took uh US direction to attack the airport on Sana and then uh unleash the war all over again. I mean it has nobody to blame but itself and its poor judgment and its quizzling obeisance to the United States. Uh I mean this was predictable and it is you know you have the two arteries of the global hydrocarbon flow the uh
you know the Babel Mandeb and the straight of Hormuz. Uh and when the straight of Hormuz essentially was closed down, South Korea was shifting its hydrocarbon flows through the east west pipeline uh 22 minutestowards uh the Red Sea. Uh and at the same time, this is the utter foolishness of it. It attacked uh Yemen uh the the Ansar Allah uh uh uh Ansar Allah group returning from Iran after the funeral of
the supreme leader. And so by reigniting the war, they put themselves uh into this uh quandry uh quagmire that they have no way getting out of. And of course, if you're fighting a war with a bunch of mercenaries, uh you are not going to prevail. I mean, essentially, when push comes to shove, uh motivated uh uh national military fighting against uh colonizing force, which is what Saudi Arabia is in Yemen, is
going to prevail. And so not only does uh Yemen not only has Yemen shown its military metal, it's shown its military uh strategic uh acumen and it has also shown its capacity to uh to to put tremendous pain on Saudi Arabia. on simply, you know, the attack on the presidential compound as well as, you know, the beating back along the coastline, but also the fact that it has, you know, shut down
the East West pipeline. It's attacked it multiple times. Uh, and we also know that it is capable of shutting down the Red Sea completely. In particular, if the Babel Mandeb is is shut down, Saudi Arabia will try and send oil through uh tankers can't go through the Sewish Canal, but they're trying to get uh oil out through terminals into the Mediterranean and then they'll do another four-week trip around the Horn, etc.
even that has been shown to be extremely vulnerable and I think those uh those targets uh will be knocked out and completely uh destroyed if Saudi Arabia continues to escalate. It will not if it doesn't come to the table and negotiate rapidly with Yemen. Saudi Arabia is in a very very bad place. Uh it is on the verge of collapse. uh the house of Saud which has been a US quizzling for
decades uh is no longer viable. Uh and I think the sooner they realize this, the sooner they come to grips with the reality, uh I think the better it will be for the rest of the world. In the meantime, Yemen controls uh the Babel Mandab, it controls the left artery, Iran controls the right artery. It's a very very uh you know it's a zukswang for the Saudis and they can lash out
all they want. They can lash out against China, against Iran, against the United States even. It's not going to make any difference. Uh geopolitical, geoeconomic, geo uh strategic realities make it so that Saudi Arabia does not have any good options left at this point. Chapter 7: China and Russia's role Yeah. Well, uh uh the I find it very interesting that the longer that these wars go on now, both uh in West
Asia, the war in Iran and the war against Sansar, which is being both of which are facing big problems. KJ, um I find it very interesting that China, Russia, they're getting lumped in, they're getting pulled back into the narrative by the empire and its various uh uh you know um attendant forces. Like for example, the UK. Look at I mean this unrepentant racism like putting this they put up this picture to
try to make Ensural look like they're some kind of uh hysterical uh you know uh aggressive force uh with the zoomed-in picture. But essentially, Telegraph is reporting here that China is supporting the Iranbacked Houthis on as a way to pressure the United States saying that the militant group is seeking a medium-range ballistic missile, the Kyber Shakan missile that Iran has uh which would be made with Chinese components, saying that a ship
last year that was intercepted um and off the Red Sea had uh Chinese components in it that could build uh that could build this missile. What what do you make of this? Because what we see I think is the United States in terms of its actual policy and the collective west uh uh very much very disjointed now on Russia and China in terms of how it looks apparently. The Trump administration meeting
with she uh easing economic sanctions on Russia seemingly all because this is necessary for for the moment. But at the same time, the combined west, the collective west has not at at all as a whole uh dialed back at all. Now they're actually trying to include China and Russia in some kind of cold war fantasy in West Asia. So your thoughts on this, KJ? What 27 minutesdo you make of these reports
that China is aiding and abetting on Sarala? I think much of the world will think that's cool, but what do you make of the uh the actual reality of it? I mean, we don't know. We don't know the exact dimension. Certainly, you know, China has been supporting Iran, certainly Iran's sovereignty, uh certainly with uh certain types of intelligence. The actual details further than that, we don't know. But as you point out,
it's probably what most of the world would support as well as you know the support of Ansar Allah. What we do know is that Ansurah's missile technology comes with comes from North Korea. uh and so you know North Korea and Ansar Allah have um and Yemen uh initially South Yemen but including you know the uh the resistance now uh they are uh strongly supported by North Korean technology and North Korean strategy.
This is the entire you know uh geographic uh dispersion and uh tunnel warfare that both Iran and Yemen and Allah have been using. uh it does look disjointed because the US is trying to see if it can work uh with its enemies because it's trying to deal with the immediate pressures of the war that it triggered in West Asia. Uh and for them ultimately these wars are interconnected. Essentially they're interconnected in
the sense that these are all decolonial wars. their wars where countries are trying to regain uh national sovereignty. They're trying to liberate themselves from the global US empire. And so in in that sense they're uh they are connected and from the standpoint of the US of course from the standpoint of the hgeimon uh they want to repress any uh you know counter uh counterhmonic movements. So certainly they want to blame. I
wouldn't put much uh you know trust in the telegraph. They they are a tabloid. They say anything that comes to mind. Uh they are you know utter and shameless uh propagandists. Uh the the Chapter 8: US control over South Korea the the more dangerous propagandists are the ones that seem plausible and uh people think oh yeah that sounds about right. And they go for that. So anything that you see in the
telegraph you can you know toss it in in the waste bin it doesn't mean anything but it is true that you know there is a core uh strength of the multipolar world which is the cranks you know it's China Russia Iran and North Korea and they form the kind of hard uh forceful backbone which can hit back if necessary and certainly they may be giving certainly moral support if not other support
to other uh liberation movements around the global south. Yeah. Well uh great points KJ. Now uh you know maybe you can talk more about the I know you wrote a recent piece in counter punch on the US uh controlling South Korea's military uh operational controller opcon. And maybe you can elaborate on this. It seems like the overall the United States is really trying to rely on those forces in the world that
it still has I guess you could say both formally with this case of South Korea uh but also informally in other countries as well like operational control trying its hardest to rely on these forces in order to achieve objectives uh against Iran and then of course in the bigger scene Russia and China, but lots of problems are emerging. Are are problems emerging in this case too with South Korea, KJ? What um
maybe you can talk more about that and how it reflects the broader world situation that we find ourselves in. Yeah, there they there there have always been problems about this issue and it's a kind of a mind-boggling thing if you really stop and think about it. But the United States controls South Korea's military and that is an abrogation of sovereignty which is unheard of in modern history that uh quote unquote a
sovereign state has its military its entire military 500,000 troops plus 3.1 million troops 3.6 million troops are controlled by the United States. It's like one of those things where people think I can't believe it. You know, it's it's does this still exist in the current uh modern age. The answer is yes. And the reason for it is uh 76 years ago uh the US took control of South Korea's military during the
Korean War, which uh most informed historians think was triggered by South Korea. But anyway, it still controls South Korea's military to this day. And this is just mind-boggling because it's known that militaries will try and create a unified command. If there are multiple militaries fighting together, they will create a unified command and they'll do that by uh transferring opcon. Uh but that is done very very rapidly and then once war ends
it is released back to the sovereign country because you know you don't want to hold on to another country's military forever. In Korea, it's lasted over, as I said, over 76 years. And South Korea's asked for its opcon back repeatedly. This is the thing that tells you that South Korea is a US vassel because it's asked over and over and over again. It's been over three decades since it's asked for it
back. And the US has always delayed, filibustered, waffled, and moved the goal points goalpost. So most recently the US signaled that there's going to be more delay and Javier Brunson who is the USFK commander, CNC commander, CFC commander essentially the person who controls South Korean troops has said security conditions have changed and we cannot return opcon on a timeline. It has to be conditions bound and those conditions have changed which the
South Korean uh government has taken to mean that that means never. So anyway, samyong when he came to power the current president said that OBON needed to be returned to him before the end of his term in 2030. Uh and Bernson has said there can be no timeline. In other words, 76 years is not enough uh is never good enough for you. South Korea originally set deadlines for the return of Opcon.
Uh in 2003, the US agreed it would return by 2012. And then in 2010, suddenly there was this massive escalation on the peninsula. Uh uh Korean ship was sunk and all of a sudden Opcon became, you know, you couldn't transfer Opcon anymore. And then they said uh in 2014 2017 we will return them on a conditionsbased uh uh if certain conditions are met and those conditions are essentially can South Korea defend
itself does it have interoperability etc. All of the answer to all of those questions is yes. It's yes yesterday. But there's a third clause which essentially says are the conditions stable enough for opcon transfer. And this is the catch 22. This is the thing that's designed to undermine the transfer or the return of opcon because if you say that there has to be a conducive security environment that is to say literally
the security environment on the Korean peninsula and in the broader region i.e. China must be stable and conducive to a safe uninterrupted transfer. That's the catch 22. So you know they say it's conditionsbased. we say you have to pass certain tests but if conditions are stable then they won't do the tests uh because these are tied to field exercises that they don't that they deescalate when they don't feel they don't need
them but if they do and the conditions are escalated North Korea responds very badly to field war games then you know the tensions have been increased and then the security conditions are not met it's not safe to transfer so this is a formula for ensuring Opcon is never transferred. But I really want to highlight that it does not take 20, 30 years to transfer opcon in wartime. Opcon is simply signed over
rapidly and it's returned rapidly. That's what it that's what should happen. But it's not being returned because the US requires or wants South Korean troops to wage war against China. 3.6 six million troops is a lot of cannon foder and they do not want to give that up and that is the key reason why the United States is holding on to opcon for DI. It's trying to create these kind of weird
Rube Goldberg structures where it's trying to have parallel and a horizontal command and it's trying to do these Rub Goldberg carveouts and there is already a Rube Goldberg carveout because um they say that well you know we don't really control South Korean opcon we only have wartime opcon that's actually a nonsense statement Because operational control means operations are warfighting. So essentially they're saying we only have wartime war fighting control. That's a
tautology. It's a pleonazm. The only time control of the military matters is during fighting just as the only time you know control of a car matters is when you're steering it and it's moving. So this notion that they have returned peace time. They say they returned in 1994. They returned peacetime opcon to South Korea. This is a booby prize. It's like one of those toy steering wheels that you stick on the
dashboard for children so they can pretend they're steering while somebody actually drives. You know, it's a political toy. So, it gives the illusion of control, but it means nothing. And the simple fact is that the US will not transfer OPCON because it doesn't share command. When you say joint control, shared command, the US never shares control, will not share control with a South Korean general. So, you know, essentially, uh, it's a
fraud. And you also know it's a fraud because the US gets to decide when is peace time and when is wartime, right? If you if you decide when the car is driven and who gets to drive it, it's your car and only you can drive it. If that's the case, then it's not it's it's it's that person's car and anybody who, you know, spends time around it when it's still in the
garage, they are the maintenance crew. It's essentially if one party decides who gets control when it has control, then it's they have control. And so this notion that it only has wartime opcon is a red herring. You know, you slice the cake, you decide which portion to take, and you decide when to eat it. It's your bloody cake. So the US is holding on to OPCON. It needs control over Korean troops
because it's planning for war with China in the Pacific. It wants the cannon fodder, 3.6 million troops. South Korea is one of the most powerful the most advanced militaries in the world the fifth most powerful in the milit in the world and it also has unlike many other countries it has the defense industrial base to sustain it and on top of that South Koreans have always fought in US wars more military-aged
men saw fighting in Vietnam than Americans as a portion of the population and it was the third largest deployment to Iraq so The US avoids a draft because South Korea has one. Uh, and this notion that it doesn't control OPCON is just a political stunt. It really has to do with the embarrassment when South Korean troops massacred civilians in Guangju in 1980 and since then or before then and since then they've
been involved in multiple military coups and coup attempts. The US 40 minuteswants that kind of, you know, plausible deniability at the same time that it still wants to control South Korea's military as a proxy for war. So you get this crazy quilt of parallel unified command structures, multiple command authorities, phased operating assessments, and you have this Frankenstein cobbled leadership structure, but essentially they want their cake and to eat it too. and
they're assisted by farright factions uh in South Korea who have lashed themselves to the US empire and they see any loss of uh US control as loss of their own power and status and so there's a vast nexus of quizzlings and subcontractors to US empire that are used as the pretext where they say oh well South Korea wants to wants to keep us there it's like all goes every time the US
says you know we are in a certain country because they want us to be there that's absolute nonsense the same thing with those who claim that South Korea wants the US to you know maintain opcon that the Koreans don't want to US to give up opcon that's a kind of a nonsense colonial propaganda but uh the real risk here is that US is using its proxies it does not want to give
out its proxies and that signals that the US has not given up any of its ambitions for war with China and so uh it is a very very dangerous situation. Ibach is trying hard to reclaim OPCON. Let's hope he does that in a real substantive fashion. But if he doesn't, it will be catastrophic because it means that US has a license and a kind of you know moral hazard uh that it
will use to escalate to war against China. What's uh so striking about this KJ, we've in this show so far, we've talked about, you know, strike plans against Iran, Ansarala, a really disastrous war there, and now we're talking about the United States uh empire uh having a difficult time utilize or or at least achieving anything uh through its proxies, but still wanting that control so so deep into the game of trying
to control uh its proxies that it even tries to treat Iran as a proxy and say, "Oh, let us strike uh let us strike you." It's so I feel like we've come to the point where there's just so much desperation and also the thirst for power and of course uh the longer that failures kind of mount uh the more uh intense this push uh for dominance and control becomes not least because
the the opposite is just completely intolerable. And now there are consequences that I that we don't often get to talk about, but maybe we can on the economic front. We often talk about runaway inflation. We often talk Chapter 9: Unrest in France about the oil crisis and the price of oil and all of this, but really those are just the symptoms of a massive problem uh with an the economic foundations of
this empire. And uh we have massive protests in France which uh are engulfing the country. We have Emanuel Mcronone commenting today on these saying there's no room for violence on our republic. Those who have broken and attacked prefectures business looted our town halls will be prosecuted and punished to law enforcement forces. Guarantees of the right to demon guaranters of the right to demonstrate. I express the support of the nation. We will
stand against the sers of chaos who seek to bring down our institutions and prevent those who peacefully express their demands from doing so. Referencing the student uh protests that are happening there. KJ, Time magazine, I didn't even want to read this because Time magazine is a is a rag for the neocons. But why is France burning? Why is it that there is this revolt in France, KJ? And what does it say
about the overall foundations of this empire? because it's the United States at the head, but it's a it's a system that encompasses the West and they're supposed to be driving it toward uh their aims and objectives and the consequences of it economically almost entirely focus on things like inflation and the oil crisis, but it's much deeper than that. And so I want please uh help us understand what's going on here and
what does it reflect? Well, inflation and collapse of living standards are surface phenomena of the deep contradictions of capitalism. But most uh notably in the case of France, it's the neoliberal austerity that the government is trying to force on the people. Uh it has to, you know, cough up uh somewhere in the range. It it wants to cut about uh 48 billion dollars uh from social services from uh a system that
is already cut to the bone which you see for example in French schools where one out of 10 teachers is missing uh you know the classrooms are falling to pieces students are being warehoused their toilets are overflowing and the rats and uh rats are running around and there's you know no air conditioning in the summer and no heat in the winter. So all of this is uh these are legitimate claims for
the students to protest. And in the past, for example, in the 1990s when they came out with these legitimate demands, the government would actually make reasonable accommodation. They cannot do that anymore because they are firmly set on this road of austerity because they are dealing with massive war costs. uh France has already committed $23 billion to Ukraine and those costs are going to continue to increase at the same time that it
is 112% uh you know national debt. So it cannot balance the books and essentially it is cutting things to the bone and the French people are not going to take it. Most certainly the students are expressing what they feel is legitimate in quote unquote a democracy. But the bigger and deeper picture of it is not simply that the war is draining the coffers of all European states because the US has demanded
that they spend 5% of GDP on on the military. That's that's a target that they cannot meet. For decades they were unable to meet 2%. How are they going to meet 5% targets? And at the same time, you see as the multipolar world is arising and it is completing the process of decolonization, France is no longer able to do the kind of one-sided unfair colonial extraction that it was capable of doing.
Remember, France controlled about a third of Africa. Its wealth came from colonies in Africa and Southeast Asia, etc. you know Michelin you know the Michelin the tire company those were those were you know rubber plantations essentially slave plantations in Southeast Asia etc. So French culture and French power and French wealth is built on colonial extraction. And now that the process of decolonization is happening in concrete ways in the African countries for
example, France is struggling and is facing a severe crisis in economic conditions is I would say it's facing an existential crisis. And so add to that the internal contradictions where it can no longer uh sustain the conditions of living that it used to pay off a labor aristocracy then you are going to get those contradictions bubbling to the four in terms of mass protest. Now when Macron says there is no room
for violence, he's lying through his teeth because we know that uh what he's imposing on the vast majority of peaceful protesters is mass police violence. The sers of chaos are actually the police. But he's doubling down on this fascistic violence because essentially uh France is reverting to its fascistic roots. Anybody who spent time in France knows that there is a deep uh strain of right-wing fascism inside the French body politic and
he's tapping right back into that and he's using quote unquote the forces of orders where you know these uh fascistic tendencies are concentrated and using them to see if he can bash enough heads uh so that the French will uh you know uh will you know will will submit well you France asumse has said no we will not submit these are reasonable demands uh we need to claim back our country uh
and the students are uh students not simply now the high school students but also some university students are joining uh they're also being joined by the yellow vest you know which is a worker uh rebellion or worker resistance and so I think Macron has a very very dangerous powder keg on his hands is he going to double down further on this militaristic uh violence and repression. It's very possible. I think most
European countries have reverted to greater or lesser degrees, I would say greater degrees of fascism in tamping down their terminal contradictions. I mean, fascism is simply capitalism in decline. Uh but I think uh things are going to get much much worse both for Macron but also unfortunately for the French people. Well, there are some scenes coming out right now we can take a look at. Here is some of the videos coming
out of uh Chapter 10: Terminal decline and activism protesters and uh what some are calling rioters uh um attacking the police essentially because as you said uh the police have been attacking them. I mean that there is a long history of that you can simply see. And then there's also uh supposedly protesters are marching toward the presidential palace uh in France right now. Um many declaring that mcronism as it's been called.
Uh disastrous dastardly word in my opinion, but mcronism is is essentially over. But it seems like it's been that way for a while. KJ, the what this reflects to me it seems is something that's happening across the Combined West and even the United States. the legitimacy of these governments are is not just waning but essentially collapsing to zero. And uh it's so interesting to see these scenes that are reminiscent of what
they uh you know the neocons imperialists they try to paint onto Iran, China, uh Russia. They try to say oh there these countries are so unstable and they repress their own populations. The scenes coming out of France seem to indicate that that is more true for the combined west itself and we know what the US does when there are massive protests here. Your uh your thoughts on this the uh the scenes
coming out are are only going to get worse it seems as uh you know France there's a history here. France tends to uh at least in the west uh people there tend to really uh uh move fast and hard when uh things like this emerge. Your thoughts? Well, you know, as I've you know, as we know, France has a history of revolution and revolt. In 1789, in May 1968, the uh coalition
of workers and students actually brought down the government. Uh so France has a history of rebellion and resistance. uh but uh in this this time round I think that it is not going to be as easy as it was in 1968 or in uh 1995 or other periods where uh you know protests were able to protesters were able to get real uh concessions or even substantive you know uh change in the
structure of the political economy. I think the key thing to remember is in 2008 Nicholas Sarosi was the president uh and he said one of the few accurate things that he uh that he ever uttered was he said capitalism is finished and he understood that because when the global economy financial system collapsed in 2008 he understood that was the deathnell of capitalism and that's when everybody should have been pivoting towards a
different type of political economy. Instead, they doubled down on neoliberal austerity. And we've had just a series, a succession of neoliberal reforms in France where things are simply getting paired closer and closer to the bone. The muscle and the senu have been shaved off and now we're scraping marrow. And the French can't go on that way indefinitely. It's also tied to the fact the loss of the imperial extraction, the unfair uh
you know uh extraction from the colonies. All of this have created uh chaos and deep fundamental 54 minutescontradictions in France metropol, you know, the the the center of uh colonial France. Uh and it's also been aggravated by this war against Russia. Now originally the war against Russia was actually another type of imperial expansion. They would you know uh destroy Russia and then they would carve it out and it would be another
you know colonial uh uh uh uh boondoggle or windfall. Uh Russia has fought back. They are losing the war against Russia this proxy war using Ukraine. And so conditions are simply getting harder and harder. And so you know you know just the symbolism of plus dulla publique where the revolution itself uh was declared uh I think that is important but the French uh system is heading towards terminal collapse as are the
systems of most of the European 55 minutescountries not just France Spain UK Germany uh all of them are facing critical structural crisis uh and there's no good way out of it. And instead of fundamentally transforming their political economy, uh they've lashed themselves down to further neoliberal austerity, further destruction of their social welfare net, and further uh doubling down on war. That is, they're going to put, you know, billions uh uh billions
into the war, billions into Ukraine. uh and they're not going to and they're going to defund uh most of their uh education and other services. This is an act of madness. But this is what the ruling imperial class want. This is how they think. Uh the simple fact is that you know it's it's like being addicted to a drug. Hegemany is one hell of a drug and they simply cannot let go
of it. They will rather destroy everything uh than let go of their uh addiction to power. Well, KJ, it's been a great show today. I think uh that might be a good place to end it. Uh everyone should hit the like button before you go. That helps boost the show in the algorithm. Uh KJ, do you have any final words before we head out? Uh any anything we didn't get to hit
on? Well, um I just want to do just another plug for the taxpayer uprising that Code Pink is leading in November 10, November 10th to November 12th in Washington DC. This 3 days of peaceful protest and resistance. So essentially they're saying, you know, we have a $1.5 trillion war budget, probably closer to 1.3 uh 2.3 trillion, but at least on paper, $ 1.5 trillion war budget. And that is gutting our society.
Just as it's gutting France and Europe, it is also gutting our society. We feel it. All we have to do is look around in our environment. We see the incredible imiseration, hopelessness, homelessness. You know, uh over 1.5% of the US population lives in absolute poverty. 40% do not have $500 to their name. 60% do not have $1,000 to their name. The miseration is getting worse and worse. And a large part of
it is because we are endlessly manufacturing enemies uh Iran, China, Russia and endlessly spending our national wealth on wars. And so this is a demand that uh uh CodePink is making to put pressure on Congress as is our democratic right to the extent that it still exists is to you know put pressure on the incoming Congress and put the politicians of both parties including the Democrats on notice that they have to
turn around this war making greed-driven echocidal ship around. uh and uh and I think that this is really really important. It's gone, you know, it's supported by most of the major uh peace uh and social justice organizations. Uh and you can go to code pink uh and look for the taxpayer uprising and give your support to It's one of the concrete things that we can do in this terrible terrible moment where
everything is hitting the fan and we are confused as to what to do. This is one very very concrete action that everybody can take right and um I published this link in the video description below uh which you can find which will describe what it is what KJ just described here a campaign that's very important uh we should all support it um you could go you know you could sign up you
could donate you could volunteer participate online whatever you want to do but the link in the video description is below after the show so hit the like button everybody that helps boost the show in YouTube's algorithm. And also, I'll find all the place to support this channel in the video description below, too. Patreon, substack, and much more. Tomorrow, I'll be back 1 p.m. Eastern time with Professor Muhammad Morandi. I'll see you
all then, 1:00 p.m. Eastern time. Until next time.