NOTE TO SIXTH
EDITION.
The
fifth English edition of Esoteric Buddhism consists of the text of
the fourth American edition, together with the larger part of the
preface specially furnished by Mr. Sinnett for the American edition.
He took the opportunity afforded by a new edition, also, to append
to some of the chapters annotations upon points calling for
explication. These annotations are now added to the sixth American
edition as an appendix. The present edition therefore corresponds
with the latest English edition, and has besides matter in the
author’s preface not incorporated in any English edition.
INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN
EDITION.
THIS
book was written in the early part of 1883, and now that I am
venturing to recommend it to public notice afresh in the latter part
of 1884, after three English editions have passed through the press,
I find myself in possession of much additional information bearing
on many of the problems dealt with. But I am glad to be able to say
that such later teaching as I have yet received only reveals
incompleteness in my original conceptions of the esoteric
doctrine,—no material error so far. Indeed, I am happy enough to
have received, from the great adept himself from whom I obtained my
instruction in the first instance, the assurance that the book as it
now stands is a sound and trustworthy statement of the scheme of
Nature as understood by the initiates of occult science, which may
have to be a good deal developed in future, if the interest it
excites is keen enough to constitute an efficient demand for further
teaching of this kind on the part of the world at large, but will
never have to be remodeled or apologized for.
Further than this, the reception of the book in India has shown
that the doctrines thus for the first time set forth in a coherent
and straightforward way are recognized, when thus stated, by various
schools of Oriental philosophy as consonant with their fundamental
views. A Brahman Hindoo, writing in the Indian magazine, “The
Theosophist,” for June, 1884, criticises the present volume as
departing unnecessarily from accepted Sanskrit nomenclature;
but his objection merely is that I have given unfamiliar names in
some cases to ideas which are already expressed in Hindoo sacred
writings, and that I have done too much honor to the religious
system commonly known as Buddhism, by representing that as more
closely allied with the esoteric doctrine than any other. “The
popular wisdom of the majority of the Hindoos to this day,” says my
Brahman critic, “is more or less tinged with the esoteric doctrines
taught in Mr. Sinnett’s book, misnamed ‘Esoteric Buddhism,’ while
there is not a single hamlet or village in the whole of India in
which people are not more or less acquainted with the sublime tenets
of the Vedanta philosophy. . . . The effects of Karma in the next
birth, the enjoyment of its fruits, good or evil, in a subjective or
spiritual state of existence prior to the reincarnation of the
spiritual monad in this or any other world, the loitering of the
unsatisfied souls or human shells in the earth (Kamaloca), the
pralayic and manwantaric periods, . . . are not only intelligible
but are even familiar to a great many Hindoos, under names different
from those made use of by the author of ‘Esoteric Buddhism.’” So
much the better from the point of view of Western readers, to whom
it is a matter of indifference whether the exoteric Hindoo or
Buddhist religion is nearest to absolutely true spiritual science,
which should ‘certainly bear no name that appears to wed it to any
one faith in the external world more than to another. All that we in
the West can be anxious for is to arrive at a clear understanding as
to the essential principles of that science, and if we find the
principles defined in this book claimed by the cultured
representatives of more than one great Oriental creed as equally the
underlying truths of their different systems, we shall be all the
better inclined to believe the present exposition of doctrine worth
our attention.
In regard to the complaint itself, that the teachings here,
reduced to an intelligible shape are incorrectly described by the
name this book bears, I cannot do better than quote the note by
which the editor of “The Theosophist” replies to his Brahman
contributor. He says “We print the above letter, as it expresses, in
courteous language and in an able manner, the views of a large
number of our Hindoo brothers. At the same time it must be stated
that the name of ‘Esoteric Buddhism’ was given to Mr. Sinnett’s
latest publication, not because the doctrine propounded therein is
meant to be specially identified with any particular form of faith,
but because Buddhism means the doctrine of the Buddhas,
the Wise, i. e. the Wisdom Religion.” For my own part I
need only add that I fully accept and adopt that explanation of the
matter. It would, indeed, be a misconception of the design which
this book is intended to subserve, to suppose it concerned with the
recommendation, to a dilettante modern taste, of old world
fashions in religious thought. The external forms and fancies of
religion in one age may be a little purer, in another age a little
more corrupt, but they inevitably adapt themselves to their period,
and it would be extravagant to imagine them interchangeable. The
present statement is not put forward in the hope of making Buddhists
from among the adherents of any other system, but with the view of
conveying to thoughtful readers, as well in the East as in the West,
a series of leading ideas, relating to the actual verities of
Nature, and the real facts of Man’s progress through evolution,
which have been communicated to the writer in their present shape by
Eastern philosophers, and thus fall most readily into an Oriental
mould. But the value of these teachings will perhaps be most fully
realized when we clearly perceive that they are scientific in their
character, rather than polemical. Spiritual truths, if they are
truths, may evidently be dealt with in a no less scientific spirit
than chemical reactions. And no religious feeling, of whatever color
it may be, need be disturbed by the importation into the general
stock of knowledge of new discoveries about the constitution and
nature of Man on the plane of his higher activities. True religion
will eventually find a way to assimilate such fresh knowledge in the
same way that it finally acquiesces in a gradual enlargement of
knowledge on the physical plane. This, in the first instance, may
sometimes disconcert notions associated with religious belief,—as
geological science at first embarrassed biblical chronology. But in
time men came to see that the essence of the biblical statement does
not reside in the literal sense of cosmological passages, and
religious conceptions grew all the purer for the relief thus
afforded.
In just
the same way, when positive scientific knowledge begins to embrace a
comprehension of laws relating to the spiritual development of Man,
some misconceptions of Nature long blended with religion may have to
give way, but still it will be found that the central ideas of true
religion have been cleared up and brightened all the better for the
process. Especially, as such processes continue, will the internal
dissensions of the religious world be inevitably subdued. The
warfare of sects can only be due to a failure on the part of rival
sectarians to grasp fundamental facts. Could a time come when the
basic ideas on which religion rests should be comprehended with the
same certainty with which we comprehend some primary physical laws,
and disagreement about them be recognized by all educated people as
ridiculous, then there would not be room for very acrimonious
divergences of religious sentiment. Externals of religious thought
would still differ in different climates and among different
races,—as dress and dietaries differ, but such differences would not
give rise to intellectual antagonism.
Basic facts of the kind that must, when they come to be widely
recognized as such, have a tendency in this way to blend together
superficially divergent views, not to provoke a trial of strength
between them, are developed, it appears to me, in the exposition of
spiritual science we have now obtained from our Eastern friends. It
is quite unnecessary for religious thinkers to turn aside from them
under the impression that they are arguments in favor of some
Eastern, in preference to the more general Western, creed. If
medical science were to discover a new fact about Man’s body, were
to unveil some hitherto concealed principle on which the growth of
skin and flesh and bone is carried on, that discovery would not be
regarded as trenching at all on the domain of religion. Would the
domain of religion be invaded by a discovery, for example, that
should go one step behind the action of the nerves, and disclose a
finer set of activities manipulating these as they manipulate the
muscles? At all events, even if such a discovery might begin to
reconcile science and religion, no man who allows any of his higher
faculties to enter into his religious thinking would put aside a
positive fact of Nature, clearly shown to be such, as hostile to
religion. Being a fact, it is inevitable that it should fit in with
all other facts, and with religious truth among the number. So with
the great mass of information in reference to the evolution of Man
embodied in the present statement. Our best plan evidently is, to
ask, before we look into the report I bring forward, not whether it
will square in all respects with preconceived views, but whether it
really does introduce us to a series’ of natural facts connected
with the growth and development of Man’s higher faculties. If it
does this, we may wisely examine the facts first in the scientific
spirit, and leave them to exercise whatever effect on collateral
belief may be reasonable and legitimate, later on.
Ramifying, as the explanation proceeds, into a great many side
paths, it will be seen by the readers of this book that the central
idea now presented to us completes and spiritualizes the great
conception of physical anthropology, which accounts for the
evolution of Man’s body by successive and very gradual
improvements of animal forms from generation to generation. That is
a very barren and miserable theory, regarded as an all embracing
account of creation; but, properly understood, it paves the way for
a comprehension of the higher concurrent process, which is all the
while evolving the soul of Man in the higher spiritual realms of
existence. The circumstances under which this is done reconcile the
evolutionary method with the instinctive craving of every
self-conscious entity for perpetuity of individual life. The
disjointed series of improving form on this earth have no
individuality, and the life of each in turn is a separate
transaction which finds no compensation for suffering involved, no
justice, no fruit of its efforts, in the life of its successor. It
is possible to argue on the assumption of a new independent creation
of a human soul, every time a new human form is produced by
physiological growth, that in the after spiritual state of such soul
justice may be awarded; but then this conception is itself at
variance with the fundamental idea of evolution, which traces, or
believes that it traces, the origin of each soul to the working of
highly developed matter in each cased Nor is it
less at variance with the analogies of Nature as these come under
our observation; but without going into that, it is enough for the
moment to perceive that the theory of spiritual evolution, as set
forth in the teaching of esoteric’ science. is, at any rate, in
harmony with these analogies, while at the same time it
satisfactorily meets the requirements of justice and of the
instinctive demand for continuity of individual life.
This theory recognizes the evolution of the soul as a process
that is quite continuous in itself, though carried out partly
through. the intermediation of a great series of dissociated forms.
Putting aside, for the moment, the profound metaphysics of the
theory which trace the principle of life from the original first
cause of the Cosmos, we find the soul as an entity emerging from the
animal kingdom and passing into the earliest human forms, without
being at that time ripe for the higher intellectual life with which
the present state of humanity renders us familiar. But through
successive incarnations in forms whose physical improvement, under
the Darwinian law of evolution, is constantly fitting them to be its
habitations at each return to objective life, it gradually gathers
that enormous range of experience which is summed up in its higher
development. In the intervals between its physical incarnations, it
prolongs and works out, and finally exhausts or transmutes into so
much abstract development, the personal experiences of each
life. This is the clue to that apparent difficulty which besets the
cruder form of the theory of re-incarnation, which independent
speculation has sometimes thrown out. Each man is unconscious of
having led previous lives, therefore he contends that subsequent
lives can afford him no compensations for this one. He overlooks the
enormous importance of the intervening spiritual condition, in which
he by no means forgets the personal adventures and emotions he has
just passed through, and in which he distills them into so much
cosmic progress. In the following pages the elucidation of this
profoundly interesting mystery is attempted, and it will be seen
that the view of events now afforded us is not only a solution of
the problems of life and death, but of many very perplexing
experiences on the border land between those conditions,—or rather
between physical and spiritual life,—which have engaged attention
and speculation so widely of recent years in most civilized
countries.
It was time, in fact, that the esoteric doctrine should be
offered to modern thinkers to assist them in grappling with the
enigmas which the spasmodic operation of very exalted spiritual
faculties in some eases—the manifestation of some extra-physical
laws and forces of Nature in others—have been latterly accumulating
on our hands in great abundance. Rather, I imagine, because the
conjectures put forward to account for them were unacceptable to the
cultivated world at large, than because the occurrence of
extra-physical manifestations of late years has been disbelieved
altogether, have most people been unwilling to pay close attention
to such occurrences. Nor is it necessary that they should do so now,
in order to reach an intellectual standpoint from which the whole
range of possibilities in regard to communications that may be
established between the seen and the unseen worlds may be broadly
comprehended. The higher culture of the East has been concerned with
the investigation, in its own congenial retirement, of that side of
Nature, while we in the West have been pushing forward our physical
civilization to its present great height. Different races in the
world advance in this way along different lines of progress; or,
rather,— to state the idea more scientifically in the light of the
occult doctrine,— all races have their cyclic progress to
accomplish, at one period of which they are concerned with physical
and at another with spiritual culture. We of the white race in
Europe and America—embodying within the last few centuries one phase
of the progress of our subsection of humanity—have been concerned
almost entirely, during the historic period, with the development of
our material civilization. Our religions, meanwhile, have had to do
rather with the maintenance of spiritual aspirations in a potential
state, than with the keen investigation of the facts of Nature in
the spiritual region. We have keenly investigated these facts on the
physical plane, for that was the proper function of our age; but all
earnestness of effort on the part of Oriental races, in the
meanwhile, has been turned in another direction. There, physical
civilization has been stagnant, material progress quite unimportant,
but spiritual aspirations have been not merely kept up as an
underlying sentiment in people’s minds,—they have operated to
produce the greatest manifestations of activity with which the race
has been concerned. I do not mean that the Indian or any other
Asiatic race has been as active in writing books and publishing
discoveries in spiritual science as we in the West have been with
the literature and research of physics. That kind of activity is
itself a manifestation of material civilization. But the Asiatic
races have fermented with capacities for great spiritual
development, and the consequence has been that many Eastern people
have devoted their lives to spiritual study and research, always, of
course, pursuing the methods of research and the modes of life
appropriate to a cycle of spiritual progress,—methods which lead the
student of—and still more the adept in— such science into seclusion
and secrecy.
Probably it may be due in some way to an opposite fermentation
of causes in the East and the West now that a certain interchange of
methods begins to be possible. I do not mean that the West is
turning away yet from material civilization, nor the East slackening
it devotion to spirituality, but we here are certainly readier now
than we were a generation or two ago to recognize the possibility of
acquiring real knowledge of spiritual science, and are more
generally impressed with the necessity of such acquisitions. The
East on the other hand has partially relaxed its hitherto inviolable
reserve. The important movement of which this little book is one
outcome constitutes a double illustration of the new tendency at
last discernible. It is discernible in several different ways to
acute observers who once possess themselves of the key to what is
going on. But it is only of that particular effort in which my own
willing services have been engaged that I need now speak. A book
more or less, in this ocean of books which is constantly welling
forth from active Western civilization, may seem a very small
matter; but to the highly conservative devotees of occult science in
the East; a book which sets forth in plain language, which all who
run may read, the hitherto secret interpretations of Nature’s
spiritual design that have hitherto been communicated only in the
deadliest secrecy to students of long absorption in the pursuit of
such teaching, constitutes a violation of the old occult usage which
is quite bewildering and appalling. As my Brahman critic above
referred to points out, now that the esoteric doctrine is once for
all plainly stated, it is seen to be embodied, a bit here and a bit
there, in the various sacred writings of India. But at the same time
it was nowhere stated in such terms as to be comprehensible without
prolonged and special study. And for the most part the doctrine, in
so far as it was stated, was wrapped in allegory that Western
readers have rarely had the patience to unravel. To all intents and
purposes, though the knowledge here set forth is no new discovery
for those by whom it is now revealed, it is a new revelation for the
whole world,—Eastern and Western alike,—in its present explicit
distinctness, and has only been prepared for in the West, but I
trust prepared for sufficiently, by that widespread seething
interest in spiritual things which has been working among us for
some years past.
This interest has been stimulated in various ways. The casual
occurrence of phenomena linking our physical perceptions with the
unseen world has kindled an ardent enthusiasm for inquiry along the
path of investigation thus pointed out, but the laws of Nature
affecting the vast realm of spiritual existence are far too
complicated to be discovered from an observation of the phenomena of
the relatively narrow subdivision of that realm brought within our
cognizance almost exclusively by casual and irregular occurrences of
the kind referred to. It is only with the help of esoteric
science—the accumulated experience of a great school of inquirers,
devoting faculties of the highest kind, for a long series of ages,
to the exploration of spiritual mysteries—that a sufficiently wide
view of Nature can be obtained to embrace the apparently disorderly
phenomena of the astral world,—the first beyond the physical
frontier,—in all-sufficing generalizations that cover the whole
scheme of spiritual evolution. These far-reaching and magnificent
conceptions of Nature should not only recommend themselves, when
properly understood, to minds that have shrunk from crude
conclusions based on the imperfect data of modern spiritual
observation in the West, but should also be recognized by modern
spiritualists themselves as calculated to purify and expand their
own doctrines, and guard them from liability to underrate the
grandeur of the region into which they have partly penetrated, by
relying, for its interpretation, too confidently on experiences
gathered at its threshold. For the theosophic teaching, which has
been too hastily resented by some spiritualists who have conceived
it hostile to their own acquired knowledge, will be discovered, on a
closer examination, to include these experiences, and only to
disconcert some of the conclusions derived from them. It must be
remembered that my statements concerning the phenomena of Kama
loca,—the astral world, from which most of the phenomena of
spiritualism emanate,—have been the fruit of my own questions
and inquiries rather than a portion of a carefully adjusted series
of lessons in occult science, dictated by professors applying
themselves to the art of teaching. That, indeed, has been the way in
which the whole body of exposition which this book contains has been
worked out, and it naturally follows that some parts of it are less
complete than others, and that none can be much better than general
outlines. In esoteric science, as in microscopy, the application of
higher and higher powers will always continue to reveal a growing
wealth of detail; and the sketch of an organism that appeared
satisfactory enough when its general proportions were first
discerned, is betrayed to be almost worse than insufficient when a
number of previously unsuspected minutiæ are brought to notice. In
this way, while no mistake has been made as regards any statement
actually put forward in the following pages on the subject of human
evolution after death, there will be more, I apprehend, to add to
that part of the explanation in later expansions of it, if these
become practicable, than to any other. The points which, meanwhile,
I will ask spiritualist readers to bear in mind are especially
these:
1st. It is already indicated that the dissolution of the human
principles after death, though one cannot help speaking of the
process as one of dispersion, is not actually a mechanical
separation of parts, nor even a process analogous to the chemical
dissolution of a compound body into elements on the same plane of
matter. The discussion of the process as if it were a mechanical
separation was represented from the first as “a rough way of dealing
with the matter,” and was adopted for the sake of emphasizing the
transition of consciousness from me principle to another which goes
on in the astral world after death. This transition of consciousness
is, in fact, the struggle between the higher and lower duad.
2d. The struggle just referred to may be regarded as an
oscillation of consciousness between the two duads; and when the
return of consciousness to the lower principles, during this
struggle, is stimulated and encouraged by converse with still living
entities on the earth plane, with the help of mediumship, the proper
spiritual growth of the entity in Kama loca is, to that
extent,—perhaps to a very considerable extent,—retarded. It is this
consideration which may, in a greater degree than any other, account
for the disapproval with which the adepts of occult science regard
the active practice of spiritualistic intercourse with departed
human beings. Such intercourse, though dictated from this side by
the purest affection, may seriously retard and embarrass the
spiritual development of those who have gone in advance of us.
3d. It is recognized in the following pages that intercourse
between living human beings gifted with a very elevated sort of
mediumship, or spiritual clairvoyance, and departed friends with
whom they have been closely united in sympathy during life, is
possible on the higher spiritual plane, after such persons
have passed through the struggle of Kama loca and have been
completely spiritualized. That intercourse may be of a more subtle
kind than can readily be realized by reference to examples of
intercourse on the earth plane, but may evidently be none the less
exhilarating to the higher perceptions.
By dwelling on the points of contact between the theosophic
teachings and the experience of the higher spiritualism, I think it
will be found that the alleged incompatibility of theosophy and
spiritualism is much less complete than is supposed. It is
impossible, I venture to assert, that there can be any true psychic
experience which the doctrines of theosophy or, to speak more
accurately, of that esoteric science of which theosophy is the
study—will fail to interpret and explain. And if this partial
exposition of esoteric science may leave a good deal not yet
explained in the vast region of mystery which separates death and
re-birth, surely the revelations which are made here
go far enough to establish a good claim on our respectful attention
for the present, so that some embarrassments they may still leave to
trouble our understanding may fairly be passed to a suspense
account, while we await a further illumination, to be, perhaps,
obtainable hereafter.
THE teachings
embodied in the present volume let in a flood of light on questions
connected with Buddhist doctrine which have deeply perplexed previous
writers on that religion, and offer the world for the first time a
practical clue to the meaning of almost all ancient religious symbolism.
More than this, the esoteric doctrine, when properly understood, will be
found to advance an overpowering claim on the attention of earnest
thinkers. Its tenets are not presented to us an the invention of any
founder or prophet; its testimony is based on no written scriptures; its
views of Nature have been evolved by the researches of an immense
succession of investigators, qualified for their task by the possession
of spiritual faculties and perceptions of a higher order than those
belonging to ordinary humanity. In the course of ages, the block of
knowledge thus accumulated, concerning the origin of the world and of
man, and the ultimate destinies of our race,—concerning also the nature
of other worlds and states of existence differing from those of our
present life,—checked and examined at every point, verified in all
directions, and constantly under examination throughout, has come to be
looked on by its custodians as constituting the absolute truth
concerning spiritual things, the actual state of the facts regarding
vast regions of vital activity lying beyond this earthly existence.
European philosophy, whether concerned with religion or pure
metaphysics, has so long been used to a sense of insecurity in
speculations outrunning the limits of physical experiment, that absolute
truth about spiritual things is hardly recognized any longer by prudent
thinkers as a reasonable object of pursuit; but different habits of
thought have been acquired in Asia. The secret doctrine which, to a
considerable extent, I am now enabled to expound, is regarded not only
by all its adherents, but by vast numbers who have never expected to
know more of it than that such a doctrine exists, as a mine of entirely
trustworthy knowledge, from which all religions and philosophies have
derived whatever they possess of truth, and with which every religion
must coincide if it claims to be a mode of expression for truth.
This is a bold claim indeed, but I venture to announce the following
exposition as one of immense importance to the world, because I
believe that claim can be substantiated.
I do not say that within the compass of this volume the authenticity of
the esoteric doctrine can be proved. Such proof cannot be given by any
process of argument; only through the development in each inquirer for
himself of the faculties required for the direct observation of Nature
along the lines indicated. But his prima facie conclusion may be
determined by the extent to which the views of Nature about to be
unfolded may recommend themselves to his mind, and by the reasons which
exist for trusting the powers of observation of those by whom they are
communicated.
Will it be supposed that the very magnitude of the claim now made on
behalf of the esoteric doctrine, lifts the present statement out of the
region of inquiry to which its title refers,—inquiry as to the real
inner meaning of the definite and specific religion called Buddhism? The
fact is, however, that esoteric Buddhism, though by no means divorced
from the associations of exoteric Buddhism, must not be conceived to
constitute a mere imperium in imperio,—a central school of
culture in the vortex of the Buddhist world. In proportion as Buddhism
retreats into the inner penetralia of its faith, these are found to
merge into the inner penetralia of other faiths. The cosmic conceptions,
and the knowledge of Nature on which Buddhism not merely rests, but
which constitute esoteric Buddhism, equally constitute esoteric
Brahmanism. And the esoteric doctrine is thus regarded by those of all
creeds who are “enlightened” (in the Buddhist sense) as the absolute
truth concerning Nature, Man, the origin of the Universe, and the
destinies toward which its inhabitants are tending. At the same time,
exoteric Buddhism has remained in closer union with the esoteric
doctrine than any other popular religion. An exposition of the inner
knowledge addressed to English readers in the present day, will thus
associate itself irresistibly with familiar outlines of Buddhist
teaching. It will certainly impart to these a living meaning they
generally seem to be without, but all the more on this account may the
esoteric doctrine be most conveniently studied in its Buddhist aspect;
one, moreover, which has been so strongly impressed upon it since the
time of Gautama Buddha, that though the essence of the doctrine dates
back to a far more remote antiquity, the Buddhist coloring has now
permeated its whole substance. That which I am about to put before the
reader is esoteric Buddhism, and for European students approaching it
for the first time, any other designation would be a misnomer.
The statement I have to make must be considered in its entirety
before the reader will be able to comprehend why initiates in the
esoteric doctrine regard the concession involved in the present
disclosure of the general outlines of this doctrine as one of startling
magnitude. One explanation of this feeling, however, may be readily seen
to spring from the extreme sacredness that has always been attached by
their ancient guardians to the inner vital truths of Nature. Hitherto
this sacredness has always prescribed their absolute concealment from
the profane herd. And so far as that policy of concealment—the tradition
of countless ages—is now being given up, the new departure which the
appearance of this volume signalizes will be contemplated with surprise
and regret by a great many initiated disciples. The surrender to
criticism, which may sometimes perhaps be clumsy and irreverent, of
doctrines which have hitherto been regarded by such persons as too
majestic in their import to be talked of at all except under
circumstance of befitting solemnity, will seem to them a terrible
profanation of the great mysteries. From the European point of view it
would be unreasonable to expect that such a book as this can be exempt
from the usual rough-and-tumble treatment of new ideas; and special
convictions or commonplace bigotry may sometimes render such treatment
in the present case peculiarly inimical. But all that, though a matter
of course to European exponents of the doctrine like myself, will seem
very grievous and disgusting to its earlier and more regular
representatives. They will appeal sadly to the wisdom of the
time-honored rule which, in the old symbolical way, forbade the
initiates from casting pearls before swine.
Happily, as I think, the rule has not been allowed to operate any
longer to the prejudice of those who, while still far from being
initiated, in the occult sense of the term, will probably have become,
by sheer force of modern culture, qualified to appreciate the
concession.
Part of the information contained in the following pages has been
thrown out in a fragmentary form during the last eighteen months in “The
Theosophist,” a monthly magazine, published hitherto at Bombay, but now
at Madras, by the leaders of the Theosophical Society. As almost all the
articles referred to have been my own writing, I have not hesitated to
weld parts of them, when this course has been convenient, into the
present volume. A certain advantage is gained by thus showing how the
separate pieces of the mosaic, as first presented to public notice, drop
naturally into their places in the (comparatively) finished pavement.
The doctrine or system now disclosed in its broad outlines has been
so jealously guarded hitherto, that no mere literary researches, though
they might have currycombed all India, could have brought to light any
morsel of the information thus revealed. It is given out to the world at
last by the free grace of those in whose keeping it has hitherto lain.
Nothing could ever have extorted from them its very first letter. It is
only after a perusal of the present explanations that their position
generally, as regards their present disclosures or their previous
reticence, can be criticised or even comprehended. The views of Nature
now put forward are altogether unfamiliar to European thinkers; the
policy of the graduates in esoteric knowledge, which has grown out of
their long intimacy with these views, must be considered in connection
with the peculiar bearings of the doctrine itself.
As for the circumstances under which these revelations were first
foreshadowed in “The Theosophist,” and are now rounded off and expanded
as my readers will perceive, it is enough for the moment to say, that
the Theosophical Society, through my connection with which the materials
dealt with in this volume have come into my hands, owes its
establishment to certain persons who are among the custodians of
esoteric science. The information poured out at last for the benefit of
all who are ripe to receive it has been destined for communication to
the world through the Theosophical Society since the foundation of that
body, and later circumstances only have indicated myself as the agent
through whom the communication could be conveniently made.
Let me add, that I do not regard myself as the sole exponent for the
outer world, at this crisis, of esoteric truth. These teachings are the
final outcome, as regards philosophical knowledge, of the relations with
the outer world which, have been established by the custodians of
esoteric truth, through me. And it is only regarding the acts and
intentions of those esoteric teachers who have chosen to work through
me, that I can have any certain knowledge. But, in different ways, some
other writers are engaged in expounding for the benefit of the
world—and, as I believe, in accordance with a great plan, of which this
volume is a part—the same truths, in different aspects, that I am
commissioned to unfold. A remarkable book, published within the last
year or two, “The Perfect Way,” may be specially mentioned, as showing
how more roads than one may lead to a mountain-top. The inner
inspirations of “The Perfect Way” appear to me identical with the
philosophy that I have learned. The symbols in which those inspirations
are clothed, in my opinion, I am bound to add, are liable to mislead the
student; but this is a natural consequence of the circumstances under
which the inner inspiration has been received. Far more important and
interesting to me than the discrepancies between the teachings of “The
Perfect Way” and my own, are the identities that may be traced between
the clear scientific explanations now conveyed to me on the plane of the
physical intellect, and the ideas which manifestly underlie those
communicated on an altogether different system to the authors of the
book I mention. These identities are a great deal too close to be the
result either of coincidence or parallel speculation.
Probably the great activity at present of mere ordinary literary
speculation on problems lying beyond the range of physical knowledge,
may also be in some way provoked by that policy, on the part of the
great custodians of esoteric truth, of which my own book is certainly
one manifestation, and the volume I have just mentioned, probably
another. I find, for example, in M. Adolphe d’Assier’s recently
published “Essai sur l’Humanite Posthume,” some conjectures respecting
the destination of the higher human principles after death, which are
infused with quite a startling flavor of true occult knowledge. Again,
the ardor now shown in “Psychical Research,” by the very distinguished,
highly gifted, and cultivated men who lead the society in London
devoted to that object, is, to my inner convictions,—knowing, as I do,
something of the way the spiritual aspirations of the world are silently
influenced by those whose work lies in that department of Nature,—the
obvious fruit of efforts parallel to those with which I am more
immediately concerned.
It only remains for me to disclaim, on behalf of the treatise which
ensues, any pretension to high finish as regards the language in which
it is cast. Longer familiarity with the vast and complicated scheme of
cosmogony disclosed, will no doubt suggest improvements in the
phraseology employed to expound it. Two years ago, neither I nor any
other European living knew the alphabet of the science here for the
first time put into a scientific shape,—or subject, at all events, to an
attempt in that direction,—the science of spiritual causes and their
effects, of super-physical consciousness, of cosmical evolution. Though,
as I have explained above, ideas had begun to offer themselves to the
world in more or less embarrassing disguise of mystic symbology, no
attempt had ever been made by any esoteric teacher, two years back, to
put the doctrine forward in its plain abstract purity. As my own
instruction progressed on those lines, I have had to coin phrases and
suggest English words as equivalents for the ideas which were presented
to my mind. I am by no means convinced that in all cases I have coined
the best possible phrases and hit on the most neatly expressive words.
For example, at the threshold of the subject we come upon the necessity
of giving some name to the various elements or attributes of which the
complete human creature is made up. “Element” would be an impossible
word to use, on account of the confusion that would arise from its use
in other significations; and the least objectionable, on the whole,
seemed to me “principle,” though to an ear trained in the niceties of
metaphysical expression this word will have a very unsatisfactory sound
in some of its present applications. Quite possibly, therefore, in
progress of time the Western nomenclature of the esoteric doctrine may
be greatly developed in advance of that I have provisionally
constructed. The Oriental nomenclature is far more elaborate, but
metaphysical Sanskrit seems to be painfully embarrassing to a
translator,—the fault, my India friends assure me, not of Sanskrit, but
of the language in which they are now required to express the Sanskrit
idea. Eventually we may find that, with the help of a little borrowing
from familiar Greek quarries, English may prove more receptive of the
new doctrine—or, rather, of the primeval doctrine as newly
disclosed—than has yet been supposed possible in the East.
Go to Next Page
|