IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
						FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
						
						October 21, 2004
						
						PHILIP J. BERG, ESQ.
						Attorney for Plaintiff
						706 Ridge Pike
						Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania 19444-1711
						Telephone (610) 825-3134
						* 
						* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
						
						WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ,
						Plaintiff, 
						
						-against-
						1. 
						GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH,
						2. GEORGE WALKER BUSH,
						3. JOHN “JEB” BUSH,
						4. NEIL MALLON BUSH,
						5. MARVIN BUSH,
						6. RICHARD CHENEY,
						7. DONALD H. RUMSFELD,
						8. DOV ZAKHEIM,
						9. COLIN POWELL,
						10. RICHARD ARMITAGE,
						11. CONDOLEEZA RICE,
						12. JOHN ASHCROFT,
						13. ROBERT S. MUELLER III,
						14. DAVID FRASCA,
						15. GEORGE J. TENET,
						16. PORTER GOSS,
						17. NORMAN Y. MINETA,
						18. LARRY K. ARNOLD,
						19. TOM RIDGE,
						20. MARK RACICOT,
						21. THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC.,
						22. ALAN GREENSPAN,
						23. THOMAS A. KEAN,
						24. JAMIE S. GORELICK,
						25. PHILLIP D. ZELIKOW,
						26. JOHN F. LEHMAN,
						27. FRED F. FIELDING,
						28. KARL ROVE,
						29. THOMAS DeLAY,
						30. RICHARD PERLE,
						31. PAUL WOLFOWITZ
						32. RICHARD MYERS,
						33. RALPH E. EBERHART,
						34. KENNETH R. FEINBERG,
						35. HALLIBURTON COMPANY,
						36. KELLOG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES,
						37. THE PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY, INC.,
						38. ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE,
						39. DIEBOLD VOTING SYSTEMS, INC.,
						40. WALDEN O’DELL,
						41. SEQUOIA VOTING SYSTEMS, INC.
						42. CHUCK HAGEL,
						43. SAXBY CHAMBLISS,
						44. NEW BRIDGE STRATEGIES, LLC
						45. JOE M. ALLBAUGH,
						46. JAMES A. BAKER III,
						47. JOHN SWEENEY,
						48. MATTHEW SCHLAPP,
						49. THOMAS PYLE,
						50. MICHAEL MURPHY,
						51. GARRY MALPHRUS,
						52. CHARLES ROYAL,
						53. KEVIN SMITH,
						54. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
						55. THE UNITED STATES. DEPARTMENT OF
						HOMELAND SECURITY,
						56. THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY; and
						57. DOE #1 Through DOE #100,
						
						Defendants.
						
						No. ____________
						
						COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION
						
						TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED
						
						
						* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
						
						TABLE OF CONTENTS
						I. 
						INTRODUCTION
						II. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
						III. FACTS ON WHICH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF ARE PREDICATED
						A. THE WTC TWIN TOWERS, AS WELL AS WTC BUILDING #7, WERE 
						DESTROYED BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, AS CLEARLY PROVEN BY 
						THE LAWS OF PHYSICS; THIS DEMOLITION COULD ONLY HAVE 
						BEEN AN "INSIDE JOB."
						B. FEMA, WHICH REMOVED THE EVIDENCE BEFORE IT COULD BE 
						INDEPENDENTLY EXAMINED, MAINTAINS A BLACK-OP SHADOW 
						GOVERNMENT DESIGNED TO REPLACE THE ELECTED GOVERNMENT OF 
						THE UNITED STATES
						C. DEFENDANTS DELIBERATELY CONCEALED THE FACT THAT THEY 
						HAD AMPLE WARNINGS OF TERRORIST ATTACKS AND FAILED TO 
						ACT ON THEM, A WAR ON TERRORISM BEING NECESSARY TO 
						JUSTIFY THEIR POLITICAL AGENDA
						D. DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO AND DID ALLOW THE ATTACKS TO 
						HAPPEN BY DELAYING MILITARY INTERCEPTION OF THE HIJACKED 
						PLANES
						1. FLIGHT 11 (NORTH TOWER WTC) COULD HAVE BEEN BUT WAS 
						NOT INTERCEPTED
						2. FLIGHT 175 COULD HAVE BEEN BUT WAS NOT INTERCEPTED
						3. FLIGHT 77 NOT ONLY COULD HAVE BEEN INTERCEPTED BUT 
						WAS ALLOWED TO FLY UNCONTESTED A FULL 50 MINUTES BEFORE 
						STRIKING THE PENTAGON
						4. AN UNPRECEDENTED NATIONWIDE "GROUND STOP" ORDER, 
						WHICH MUST HAVE HAD WHITE HOUSE APPROVAL, PREVENTED EVEN 
						THE MILITARY FROM FLYING AND ALLOWED THE ATTACKS TO 
						PROCEED
						5. THE CRASH OF FLIGHT 93 IN SOMERSET COUNTY, 
						PENNSYLVANIA, RAISES SERIOUS ADDITIONAL UNANSWERED 
						QUESTIONS
						6. SOME ADDITIONAL REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY 
						OF 9-11
						E. THE ENTERPRISE HAS ENGAGED IN A CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT 
						ELECTION FRAUD
						F. ENTERPRISE'S FLORIDA RECOUNT RIOT: ADDITIONAL 
						PREDICATE ACTS UNDER RICO
						G. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS AS TO INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS, 
						PREDICATE ACTS OF RACKETEERING COMMITTED BY THEM, AND 
						THEIR ROLES IN THE RICO ENTERPRISE
						H. THE FOREGOING FACTS SUPPORT CLAIMS AGAINST THE 
						DEFENDANTS FOR MULTIPLE ACTS OF CONSPIRACY, 
						RACKETEERING, DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND OTHER CRIMES
						IV. COUNTS
						1. MISPRISION OF A FELONY (18 U.S.C. Section 4)
						2. MISPRISION OF TREASON (18 U.S.C. Section 2382)
						3. PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY (18 U.S.C. Section 
						1962c)
						4. RACKETEERING ACTIVITY (18 U.S.C. Section 1961(1))
						5. CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT RICO VIOLATIONS\(18 U.S.C. 
						Section 1962 (b, c))
						6. INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF (18 U.S.C. Section 
						1964c)
						7. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (18 U.S.C. Section 1964c)
						8. COMMON LAW INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
						9. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. Section 2201 et seq.)
						10. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
						11. RELIEF UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM ACT (18 U.S.C. Section 
						2333)
						12. RELIEF FOR AND FROM CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
						13. RELIEF UNDER WAR CRIMES ACT (18 U.S.C. Section 2441)
						V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
						VI. EXHIBITS… 
						
						Read PDF Here