Site Map

PLAYERS ON A RIGGED GRAND CHESSBOARD:  BRIDAS, UNOCAL AND THE AFGHANISTAN PIPELINE

by Larry Chin

Online Journal Contributing Editor

Part Two of a two-part series

The Bush Administration’s Afghan carpet

March 10, 2002—During the final months of the Clinton administration, the Taliban was officially a rogue regime. After nearly a decade of fierce competition between the US-supported Unocal- CentGas consortium and Bridas of Argentina, neither company had secured a deal for a  trans-Afghanistan pipeline.

Immediately upon seizing the White House, George W. Bush resumed relations with the Taliban.

Bush stocked his cabinet with figures from the energy industry with long-time ties to Central Asia (including Dick Cheney of Halliburton, Richard Armitage of Unocal, Condoleeza Rice of  Chevron), and rode into office on the largesse of corporations with vested interests in the region  (Enron). Suddenly, the prospects for a trans-Afghanistan oil and gas pipeline that would help  ensure American dominance of Eurasia, described by Zbigniew Brezezinski as “The Grand  Chessboard,” began to improve.

The Bush family’s involvement in the Middle East and Central Asian oil politics, and its deep ties to the Saudi royal and bin Laden families, span generations. Throughout his oil-soaked tenure as governor of Texas, George W. Bush colluded on a daily basis with oil and power companies, including Enron. In light of his close personal relationship with Enron CEO Ken Lay, it is reasonable to assume that Bush was aware of the company’s Central Asian aspirations.  Among Enron's many projects in the region was a $2.5 billion trans-Caspian  pipeline, for which the company conducted feasibility studies. (One recently unearthed letter between Lay and Bush on Central Asian projects can be found at:  http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/bushlay12.shtml)

In their book “Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth,” intelligence authorities Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie believe that Bush’s primary goal was to consolidate the position of the Taliban in order to secure US access to the oil and gas reserves in Central Asia. According to Brisard and Dasquie, Bush viewed the Taliban as “a source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil pipeline across Central Asia,” from the rich oil fields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean.”

According to Brisard and Dasquie, and an investigation by journalist Greg Palast, Bush also  blocked secret service and FBI investigations on terrorism, while bargaining with the Taliban for  the delivery of Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid. 

Bush administration and Taliban officials met several times in Washington, Berlin and Islamabad. Each time, the Taliban refused Bush’s conditions.

The last meeting took place in August 2001. Central Asian affairs representative Christina Rocca  and a coterie of State Department officials voiced disgust and issued a threat to the Taliban  ambassador: “Accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.”  Bush promptly informed Pakistan and India that the US would launch a military mission against  Afghanistan before the end of October.

Weeks later, under questionable circumstances, jetliners would crash into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, killing some 2,000 Americans. The ensuing war on  Afghanistan, and the “war on terrorism,” would claim the lives of more than 5,000 Afghans,  scatter (but not destroy) the Taliban and send Osama bin Laden and his Al-Queda network into  hiding.

Bush’s brutal “carpet of bombs” had done what years of Clinton administration jockeying had  failed to do: topple a recalcitrant, uncooperative regime with nationalistic tendencies, and clear the key square of the Chessboard.

A Well-Timed Economic Collapse

In Argentina, executives of the old Bridas Group (now part of BP Amoco/Pan American Energy)  must have viewed the US war in Afghanistan with more than a little interest. It was Bridas that  pioneered exploration in Turkmenistan. It was Bridas that came up with the idea of a trans- Afghanistan pipeline. Before the Clinton administration had declared war on the Taliban, it was  Bridas that was best positioned to build the pipeline.

But no Argentine was in a good position to entertain such thoughts. In the summer of 2001, the  Argentine economy collapsed.

Argentina owed $132 billion to the IMF, foreign lenders, banks, pension funds and investors. In  July 2001, riots and a general strike brought the country to a standstill. 

With the approval of George W. Bush, the IMF cut off Argentina’s $1.3 billion aid. Wall Street executives and analysts simply shook their heads, writing off Argentina as another case of  “hopeless Third World bungling.” Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank and Salomon Smith Barney were brought in to “restructure the country’s international debt exchange.”

Virtually unreported in the western media was evidence of a crippling flight of approximately $26 billion out of Argentina by foreign banks. Most of the money went to the United States.

Federal judges Norberto Oyarbide and Maria Servini de Cubria immediately launched  investigations (which are still underway). Among the targets of these probes are Citibank  (Citigroup), London-based Hong Kong Shanghai Bank, Bank of Boston, Fleet Boston and Banco  Rio (Spain)— banks tied to money laundering and on whose boards sit prominent movers and  shakers connected to the highest levels of US and world governments.

It is true that Argentina’s problems were long in the making. After a decade of “free market  reforms” begun under Carlos Menem (massive privatizations, deregulation, draconian austerity  and restructuring measures), the nation was at the mercy of multilateral institutions (International  Monetary Fund and the World Bank), and foreign banks and lenders.

Still, the timing of the capital flight, between August and November 2001, coincides with other  unusual global financial activity over the same period: a global recession, a crashing US stock  market, 9/11/ “war”-related disruptions, and Enron looting.

One investigator, Sherman Skolnick, postulates a direct connection between Argentina’s plunder  and the Afghanistan pipeline. “How do you wreck a pipeline deal for Afghanistan of a competitor group?” he writes. “Simple. You wreck Argentina’s business interests.”

Securing the Chessboard for the Empire

Just after US bombs began to fall on Afghanistan, the US representative to Pakistan, Wendy  Chamberlain, visited Usman Aminuddin, Federal Minister of Petroleum and Natural Resources,  to talk about the “proposed Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan gas pipeline project that ‘will open up new avenues of multi-dimensional regional cooperation, particularly in light of recent geopolitical developments in the region.’”

In November 2001, the White House released a statement hailing the official opening of the first  new pipeline by the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, a joint venture of Russia, Kazakhstan, Oman,  and several other oil companies—-including BP Amoco. Bush himself declared, ‘‘The CPC  project advances my administration’s National Energy Policy.” 

Just nine days after the US-backed interim Afghan government of Hamid Karzai (a former Unocal executive) took office, George W. Bush appointed former Unocal aide Zalmay Khalilzad as the new special envoy. Khalilzad reports to National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice, a  former Central Asian envoy for Chevron.

Virtually unreported in the mainstream media are the following:

• Khalizad participated in Unocal’s talks with the Taliban in 1997. In fact, it was Khalilzad  who drew up the risk analysis of the pipeline.

• Khalizad was a special advisor to the State Department during the Reagan administration, where he was instrumental in arming the mujahadeen during the 1980s.

• After serving as an undersecretary of defense under George H.W. Bush, Khalizad went to  the hawkish Rand Corporation.

The American military presence in the Balkans and Central Asia is deepening and expanding.  The US has established a permanent base near Kandahar. Three other bases are being prepared.

Marching Into the Abyss

In From the Wilderness (www.copvcia.com), Dale Allen Pfeiffer notes: “Just as the Bosnian  conflict was part of an effort to secure the Balkan states for an oil and gas pipeline to the  European energy market, so the US is seeking secure passage for a pipeline through Afghanistan  to feed the Asian energy markets and the US itself.” The skirmish between Unocal and Bridas is  just an epic story that began years, if not decades, ago.

While the ruling elite and the mainstream media continue to portray the expanding “war on  terrorism” in the most infantile and implausible terms (“axis of evil,” etc.), sober and informed  observers know better.

It is a war “of” terrorism. It is a war of, and for, control of the last untapped supplies of oil and  natural gas on earth. And the players on the Grand Chessboard will stop at nothing to win. 

_______________

Notes:

Independent Media Center. “Oil Wars: The Balkans as an Example” http://sf.indymedia.org/2001/11/109891.php

Dan Morgan and David Ottaway. “Gas Pipeline Bounces Between Agendas.” Washington Post, October 5, 1998. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/europe/caspian100598.htm

Dan Morgan and David Ottaway. “Kazakh Field Stirs U.S.-Russian Rivalry.” Washington Post, October 6,  1998. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/europe/caspian100698.htm

Dale Allen Pfeiffer. “A Bigger Picture.” December 27, 2001. http://copvcia.com

Dale Allen Pfeiffer. “What Will Be the Next Target of the Oil Coup?” January 29, 2002. http://copvcia.com

Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia (Yale University Press)

Peter Dale Scott “Afghanistan,Turkmenistan Oil and Gas, and the Projected Pipeline”  (http://socrates.berkeley.edu/pdscott/q7.html

“Oil Transport Routes” http://www.corfu1.com/spy/oil.htm

“Capital Flight Draws Probe” http://www.americas.org/news/nir/20020120_capital_flight_draws_probe.asp

“Court Steps Up Bank Probe as IMF Warns Argentina”  http://www.forbes.com/newswire/2002/01/18/rtr486124.html

Copyright © 1998–2002 Online Journal™. All rights reserved

Return to Table of Contents