"OLIGARCHICAL
MALTHUSIANISM THEN AND NOW
From 9/11 to "peak oil" is a dangerous leap, and from "peak
oil" to population reduction is more dangerous still.
Because oligarchs have always held humanity in general in
contempt, they have from time immemorial exhibited the
outlook which has, during the last 200 years, been called
Malthusian. Back among the early Greeks, one school of
thought explained the Trojan War as necessary to remove the
weight of the masses of mankind which were oppressing the
breast of Mother Earth. Together with the axiomatic notion
of overpopulation has gone a profound hostility to science
and technology, especially because of their egalitarian
effects. During the time of Thucydides in Athens, the writer
called the Old Oligarch complained that the high-tech
Athenian navy was helping the plebs to achieve upward
mobility, while the equally high-tech long walls between
Athens and Piraeus kept the armies of oligarchical Sparta at
bay. During the agony of the Roman Empire, the decrees of
the Emperor Diocletian in effect banned technological
progress by making it illegal to alter the equipment and
property of any guild. During the decline of the Venetian
Empire, the decadent Giammaria Grtes (1713- 1798) elaborated
the notion that the earth had an absolute and unalterable
maximum carrying capacity, which he set at 3 billion
persons. Ortes was the original from which the English
Reverend Thomas Malthus copied. Malthus' well-known
contention that population increases geometrically while
food supply increases arithmetically stands in contradiction
with thousands of years of successful human development.
Malthus' real interest, it should be remembered, was to
convince capitalists that they had to pay to maintain a
numerous state church made up of people like himself, whose
consumption would make sure that no crises of overproduction
occurred. This was Malthus' notorious slogan, "The church
with a capacious maw is best." Malthus was in turn the key
to the bankruptcy of Darwin, who based himself on the greedy
prelate. There is no doubt about evolution, but Darwin is a
completely separate kettle of fish, especially his wayward
thesis about the "blind watchmaker," meaning that the
universe is a totally random process. The present writer
agrees rather with Leibniz's view of a least action universe
which has a definite in-built tendency towards greater
order, greater energy organization, and greater development.
The fatal flaw of Keynesian economics is that they are based
on Malthusian premises: there is a surplus which has to be
consumed, and Keynes is unable to distinguish between
productive and parasitical ways of doing this. In more
recent times, the Malthusian outlook has been promoted with
great success by the sinister Club of Rome, founded by
Alexander King and Aurelio Peccei. The Club of Rome
sponsored that infamous hoax, the 1968 Meadows and Forrester
Limits to Growth. This fraudulent study took a snapshot of
the then-known reserves of the main industrial commodities,
and then simply extrapolated when these would be gone, based
on the current rate of consumption. Almost forty years
later, not one of these dire predictions has come to pass,
and known reserves of many raw materials are greater than
they were in 1968.
In 1971-1973, the long period of world economic expansion
associated with Franklin D. Roosevelt's Bretton Woods system
and postwar economic reconstruction came to an end in a
series of monetary crises that destroyed the most successful
monetary arrangement the world had ever seen. Since 1971-73,
long-term economic growth in the main industrial countries
has been cut in half: from about 5% per year to about 2.5%
per year. This, plus the later push for deindustrialization,
is the main reason why living standards in the US have
declined by about 50% over the same period, and the costs of
essential services like health care and education have gone
into the ionosphere. After 1971-73, we are no longer dealing
with a normal economy, but with an increasingly sick one.
THE FAKE OIL SHOCKS OF THE 1970s
Building on the lies of the Club of Rome and the Limits to
Growth, Wall Street, the City of London, and the Federal
Reserve, backed by the Seven Sisters Anglo-American oil
cartel, decided to jack up the price of oil to save the
dollar while making western Europe and Japan foot the bill.
This cynical maneuver was associated with Henry Kissinger's
Kippur War in the Middle East of October 1973. After the
hostilities began, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC) announced an Arab oil boycott. In late
December 1973, the OPEC speeches had become the pretext for
a 400% increase in the price of oil carried out by banks and
speculators in the commodity trading pits of New York and
Chicago. OPEC was blamed, but OPEC was never the real
cartel. OPEC was largely a Potemkin cartel. The real cartel
were the Seven Sisters. Without the connivance of the Seven
Sisters and their Royal Dutch Shell/British Petroleum
leadership, none of OPEC's antics could have been made to
stick. In reality, there had been no reduction in oil
deliveries to the US. In December 1973, oil-bearing
supertankers of the leading oil companies were put into a
holding pattern on the high seas because storage facilities
were already full to bursting with crude. But that did not
stop greedy speculators from bidding up the price.
The plan for the entire exercise had been provided by Lord
Victor Rothschild, the sometime head of a think tank
attached to Royal Dutch Shell, the dominant force within the
Seven Sisters oil cartel. The operation had been discussed
at a meeting of the self-styled Bilderberger Group of
finance oligarchs held at Saltsjobaden, Sweden on May 11-13,
1973. The effect of the oil price hike was to create a
massive artificial demand for US dollars, thus effectively
saving the greenback from a short-term collapse which would
have ended its role as a reserve currency, and would have
also ended the ability of US-UK finance to loot the world
using this mechanism. In particular, if the posted price of
oil were no longer expressed in dollars, then New York and
London would no longer exercise de facto control over the
oil reserves of the world. The 1973 oil crisis, followed by
petrodollar recycling from the OPEC countries to David
Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank, kept the dollar in
demand and thus prevented it from being dumped. Of course,
the world paid the price for all this wizardry in the form
of the deepest recession since World War II.
In 1978-79, Carter and Brzezinski, acting in the service of
Brzezinski's lunatic thesis that Islamic fundamentalism was
the greatest bulwark against Soviet communism, toppled the
regime of the Shah of Iran. In line with this project, the
U.S. also made sure that the Shah was replaced by Khomeini,
who embodied the negation in toto of modern civilization.
Having done so well on the fake 1973-74 oil crisis, the New
York and London finance oligarchs decided to repeat the
operation, this time using the spectre of Khomeini's
self-styled Islamic revolution. This time prices went up by
another 200%. When 1979 was over, it emerged that world oil
production had not fallen, but the prices stayed up anyway.
The 1979 doubling had more dramatic economic effects than
the 1973 quadrupling, since the world economy was much
weaker by 1979.
CHENEY WANTS $100 A BARREL OIL
When we see a book like Paul Roberts' The End of Oil being
hyped by Lou Dobbs on CNN, accompanied by a barrage of
articles in the controlled corporate media on this same
line, we can see that an Anglo-American consensus in favor
of $100 per barrel oil is developing. The rationale is not
hard to find, and has little to do with geological facts:
the US dollar is once again in terminal crisis, and oil at
$100 per barrel would create a new wave of artificial
demand, making the dollar a little more attractive for oil
producers and others, and perhaps staving off for a few more
years the end of its reserve currency and posted price
status. It is reported that the center of the agitation for
$100 a barrel oil is, not surprisingly, the Vice
Presidential office of Dick Cheney, managed by the ruthless
neocon operative Lewis I. "Scooter" Libby.
As far as the substantive argument about oil reserves is
concerned, it is clear that oil should be used less and less
as a fuel, and employed rather for petrochemicals. It is
also clear that the internal combustion engine is now a
technology that is more than 100 years old, and is due to be
replaced. However, it is also clear that a growing world
population and, hopefully, increased levels of world
economic development will require greater energy sources.
Every fixed array of human technology in world history has
always defined certain components of the biosphere as usable
resources, with the inevitable corollary that these
resources would one day be exhausted. Under such conditions,
the great imperative of human evolution cannot be
retrenchment and austerity, but rather innovation,
invention, discovery, and progress. If existing energy
sources are insufficient, then science will have to find new
ones, without ideological preclusions. Solar energy gathered
outside the ionosphere in earth orbit might be one future
solution. The one thing we must not do is to leap from a
rising oil price to coerced population reduction, since that
represents the core program of the Malthusian Anglo-American
oligarchy, and has been in place as a policy goal since
Kissinger's infamous NSSM 200 [2] and the Global 2000/Global
Futures campaigns of the Muskie State Department under the
disastrous Carter administration.
The pervasive oil and raw material grabs of today's world
suggest nothing more than world economic breakdown and
imminent world war. In 1941, Japan's main war aim was to
secure the oil of the Dutch East Indies. Hitler's panzer
divisions in Operation Barbarossa were pointed towards Baku,
which was Stalin's oil aorta. Stalin's own attack plan aimed
at Ploesti in Romania, Germany's sole source of oil. Each of
these plans sought to deny oil to an adversary and procure
it for their authors as a means of winning a war. Much the
same dynamic is afoot today, partially under the cover of
"peak oil.""
--
"9/11 Synthetic Terrorism Made in
USA," by Webster Griffin Tarpley |