|
Site Map 9-11 SCIENCE REPORT |
|
PART TWO: LARRY SILVERSTEIN’S JACKPOT DEAL This report describes what World Trade building 7 was, how it was destroyed, how Silverstein signed a lease for the entire World Trade Center only weeks before 9-11, and what the extremely suspicious economics surrounding this transaction are. The result of this report is that the economics of tearing down building 7 and signing the lease for the entire WTC bear inherent proof of Silverstein having foreknowledge of the 9-11-1 terror attacks and the government’s position in the subsequent investigations. The weakness of the 9-11 insider crime has a name: Larry Silverstein, the principal lease owner of the World Trade Center. This New York real estate magnate is not an "anonymous market participant” like in the aforementioned insider trading cases. He is extremely suspect of being a 9-11 insider with foreknowledge of America’s great synthetic terror attacks, and foreknowledge of the government’s position in the subsequent investigations. Due to such foreknowledge and action based on it, his investment company ended up with claims of $3.5 billion or possibly even $7 billion against the pool of insurance companies who insured the buildings of the World Trade Center. This is a complex business case of insurance fraud, mass murder and "synthetic terrorism” (Webster Tarpley). It has, however, a clear mathematical and financial grid. We can break its complexity down into manageable steps as follows: 1. WTC Building 7
and its Controlled Demolition (Reference to the preceding four parts of this report is made, with forensic details such as regarding the WTC fires, explosions, etc.) 1. WTC Building 7 and its Controlled Demolition 7, World Trade Center Built: 1985 7 WTC was built in 1985 as an addition to the World Trade Center, located across Vesey Street from the main compound.
The World Trade Center in Manhattan consisted of seven buildings, numbered 1 through 7. WTC1 and WTC2 were the Twin Towers, but the other buildings were of course lower and smaller than the famous Twin Towers. Here is a photo of building 7 standing between the Verizon building to its left and the Federal Building to its right, with the side of North Tower (WTC1) in the left of the photo (across Vesey Street)
A schematic
World Trade Center building 7 is the dark building before the looming Twin Towers. The light terraced building in front of it is 101 Barclay Street (view from Greenwich Street).
Here is a street map of the vicinity
A photo of seven World Trade reflecting the Twin Towers
Here is building 7 after the fall of the Twin Towers, standing near the left edge of the photo
Here is building 7 instants before its collapse at approximately 5:25 p.m. on 9-11-1 We clearly see no raging fire infernos, and not even a major smolder. The local fires on two floors (reportedly floors 7 and 12) had apparently gone extinct due to lack of fuel (the fires were reported only about 4:10 p.m. in the first place and may very well have been artificial). Building 7 was evacuated before 9:00 a.m. on 9-11-1, because, according to witness reports, there was a huge explosion in the lobby. No plane ever flew into building 7. After about 4:30 p.m. before building 7 was pulled in a controlled demolition, the firemen evacuated the area. At http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/tradecencrimes/CrummyBuildings.html we read: Take a look at these remarks from Photographer Tom Franklin who took that "Iwo Jima flag raising“ photo: http://september11.natca.org/CollectedWritings/FranklinPhoto.htm "Firemen evacuated the area as they prepared for the collapse of Building Seven. We were catching our breath, drinking water and juice, when I decided to walk back toward the debris. It was between 4 and 5 p.m. I would say I was 150 yards away when I saw the firefighters raising the flag.“ Franklin’s remarks show us that somebody told the firemen by about 4 to 5pm to stay away from the building because it was going to collapse. What evidence was there that it would collapse? Who told the firemen to stay away? Does the FBI wonder who those people were? Considering that no fire had ever caused the collapse of a steel building before, why would anybody believe building 7 would crumble from a fire? Or were they just guessing that the collapse was possible after they watched the two towers collapse? I suggest you consider the possibility that somebody was trying to keep the firemen away because they did not want the firemen to put the fire out. Also, by keeping the firemen away there would be fewer deaths to explain when the explosives were set off. We see on photos that there were merely small local fire pockets but no raging fire infernos, certainly nothing that could weaken let alone melt the structural steel that gave the highrise its stability:
Several videos from different angles show a controlled demolition with a straight vertical fall into the building’s footprint lasting 6.5 seconds, demolition squibs and cement pulverization. The fake government investigation simply leaves the question unanswered how building 7 fell. It is usually blamed on fires without any specifics. As with the entire World Trade Center, the crime scene of the destruction of building 7 was disappeared. Practically no steel from the building is left. In September 2002, the lease owner Larry Silverstein admitted in a PBS documentary entitled "America Rebuilds” (for a long time also available as a home video, ISBN 0-7806-4006-3) that he and the fire chief decided to "pull” (demolish by explosions) building 7. The decision was made in a phone call, without consulting any third parties, and without any pressing urgent need. As will be shown shortly below, these most famous authentic words of 9-11-1 hold a tremendous lie and deception to the public. The statement can only be rationally explained as a near-blackmail pressure point in Silverstein’s struggles with architects, government and competitors to implement his ideas about how to rebuild the ground zero site. * * * As with the Twin Towers, the seismic of the building 7 collapse indicates the release of a strong underground explosion energy just prior to the collapse, see chart from the data of Columbia University:
The site of the downed building 7 also held a thermal hot spot from basement pools of unnatural molten hot steel for days after the collapse, physically impossible to explain through fires alones. This is clear black-and-white physical evidence of a controlled demolition using pre-planted explosives in building 7, confirmed by the lease owner’s description of how the building was demolished ("pulled”). Here is a government photo of the hot spot of building 7, source http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/thermal.r09.html thermographic satellite photo taken on September 16, 2001, here relevant: spots A and B:
There was no compelling need to "pull” building 7. The demolition actually caused tremendously expensive damage to the Verizon building to the east (total damage sustained on 9-11-1: $1.4 billion) and to the Federal building to the west. A special officer, Craig Miller died in the demolition of building 7. This would likely qualify as a homicide. There have been many other highrise fires with much more serious conflagrations and longer burning times, and no fireman has found fit to "pull” such highrise. Apart from that the notion that such a multimillion dollar decision would be made on the phone between a single businessman and a fire chief is outright ludicrous. Silverstein was not even in full control of "his” building, since it was heavily mortgaged. This business and finance aspect is to be discussed in the next sections. Altogether, the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center under the false guise of "Muslim terror attacks” was Silverstein’s "jackpot deal” because it gave him a multi billion dollar lift at the expense of some 20 defrauded insurance companies. The gist of the fraud is Silverstein’s ruthless use of his insider knowledge that 9-11-1 would happen – invaluable insider knowledge several months before the day of terror actually did happen.
|
